Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37099595›Full record

ArticlePLoS computational biology2023

Fidelity of hyperbolic space for Bayesian phylogenetic inference.

Matthew Macaulay, Aaron Darling, Mathieu Fourment

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS computational biology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Comparative Analysis of Evolutionary Distances Using the GenusInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Article
  3. Edit Distance Embedding with Genomic Large Language Model.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Differentiable phylogeneticsBioinformatics advances · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Matthew MacaulayUniversity of Technology Sydney, Australian Institute for Microbiology & Infection, Sydney, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-6865-7979
Aaron DarlingIllumina Australia Pty Ltd, Sydney, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-2397-7925
Mathieu FourmentUniversity of Technology Sydney, Australian Institute for Microbiology & Infection, Sydney, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-8153-9822

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bayesian inference for phylogenetics is a gold standard for computing distributions of phylogenies. However, Bayesian phylogenetics faces the challenging computational problem of moving throughout the high-dimensional space of trees. Fortunately, hyperbolic space offers a low dimensional representation of tree-like data. In this paper, we embed genomic sequences as points in hyperbolic space and perform hyperbolic Markov Chain Monte Carlo for Bayesian inference in this space. The posterior probability of an embedding is computed by decoding a neighbour-joining tree from the embedding locations of the sequences. We empirically demonstrate the fidelity of this method on eight data sets. We systematically investigated the effect of embedding dimension and hyperbolic curvature on the performance in these data sets. The sampled posterior distribution recovers the splits and branch lengths to a high degree over a range of curvatures and dimensions. We systematically investigated the effects of the embedding space's curvature and dimension on the Markov Chain's performance, demonstrating the suitability of hyperbolic space for phylogenetic inference.

Indexed as

PhylogenyAlgorithmsBayes Theorem

Identifiers

PMID37099595
PMCPMC10166537

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.