ArticlePloS one2023
Multi-classification deep neural networks for identification of fish species using camera captured images.
Article in PloS one, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.
- A deep learning-based fusion framework for robust fine-grained classification of sea turtles in support of marine biodiversity.PloS one · 2026Article
- Identification of Indigenous fish species in lake Tana using deep learning.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Adaptive identity-regularized generative adversarial networks with species-specific loss functions for enhanced fish classification and segmentation through data augmentation.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- A Deep Learning-Based Sensing System for Identifying Salmon and Rainbow Trout Meat and Grading Freshness for Consumer Protection.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- AutoTFCNNY: A multi-instance neural network for enhanced early cancer detection using TCR data.PloS one · 2025Article
- SwinFishNet: A Swin Transformer-based approach for automatic fish species classification using transfer learning.PloS one · 2025Article
- Deep learning-based image classification of sea turtles using object detection and instance segmentation models.PloS one · 2024Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Regular monitoring of the number of various fish species in a variety of habitats is essential for marine conservation efforts and marine biology research. To address the shortcomings of existing manual underwater video fish sampling methods, a plethora of computer-based techniques are proposed. However, there is no perfect approach for the automated identification and categorizing of fish species. This is primarily due to the difficulties inherent in capturing underwater videos, such as ambient changes in luminance, fish camouflage, dynamic environments, watercolor, poor resolution, shape variation of moving fish, and tiny differences between certain fish species. This study has proposed a novel Fish Detection Network (FD_Net) for the detection of nine different types of fish species using a camera-captured image that is based on the improved YOLOv7 algorithm by exchanging Darknet53 for MobileNetv3 and depthwise separable convolution for 3 x 3 filter size in the augmented feature extraction network bottleneck attention module (BNAM). The mean average precision (mAP) is 14.29% higher than it was in the initial version of YOLOv7. The network that is utilized in the method for the extraction of features is an improved version of DenseNet-169, and the loss function is an Arcface Loss. Widening the receptive field and improving the capability of feature extraction are achieved by incorporating dilated convolution into the dense block, removing the max-pooling layer from the trunk, and incorporating the BNAM into the dense block of the DenseNet-169 neural network. The results of several experiments comparisons and ablation experiments demonstrate that our proposed FD_Net has a higher detection mAP than YOLOv3, YOLOv3-TL, YOLOv3-BL, YOLOv4, YOLOv5, Faster-RCNN, and the most recent YOLOv7 model, and is more accurate for target fish species detection tasks in complex environments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.