ArticlePloS one2023
An ensemble of AHP-EW and AE-RNN for food safety risk early warning.
Article in PloS one, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.
- Integrating Blockchain Traceability and Deep Learning for Risk Prediction in Grain and Oil Food Safety.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Integrating Statistical and Machine-Learning Approaches forMicroorganisms · 2025Article
- Application of Convolutional Neural Networks and Recurrent Neural Networks in Food Safety.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- The Application of Artificial Intelligence and Big Data in the Food Industry.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Advancing food safety risk assessment in China: development of new approach methodologies (NAMs).Frontiers in toxicology · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Food safety problems are becoming increasingly severe in modern society, and establishing an accurate food safety risk warning and analysis model is of positive significance in avoiding food safety accidents. We propose an algorithmic framework that integrates the analytic hierarchy process based on the entropy weight (AHP-EW) and the autoencoder-recurrent neural network (AE-RNN). Specifically, the AHP-EW method is first used to obtain the weight percentages of each detection index. The comprehensive risk value of the product samples is obtained by weighted summation with the detection data, which is used as the expected output of the AE-RNN network. The AE-RNN network is constructed to predict the comprehensive risk value of unknown products. The detailed risk analysis and control measures are taken based on the risk value. We applied this method to the detection data of a dairy product brand in China for example validation. Compared with the performance of 3 models of the back propagation algorithm (BP), the long short-term memory network (LSTM), and the LSTM based on the attention mechanism (LSTM-Attention), the AE-RNN model has a shorter convergence time, predicts data more accurately. The root mean square error (RMSE) of experimental data is only 0.0018, proving that the model is feasible in practice and helps improve the food safety supervision system in China to avoid food safety incidents.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.