ArticlePloS one2023
Global trends in antidepressant, atypical antipsychotic, and benzodiazepine use: A cross-sectional analysis of 64 countries.
Article in PloS one, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
33 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Evidence on antidepressant withdrawal: an appraisal and reanalysis of a recent systematic review.Psychological medicine · 2025Pooled it
- Oral side effects of fluoxetine in patients with depressive disorder: A systematic review.Medicina oral, patologia oral y cirugia bucal · 2025Pooled it
- Intimate Partner Violence and Subsequent Depression in Women: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Longitudinal Studies.Brain and behavior · 2025Pooled it
- Internet and Telephone Support for Discontinuing Long-Term Antidepressants: The REDUCE Cluster Randomized Trial.JAMA network open · 2024Trial
- Fenofibrate Protects Against Antipsychotic-Induced Hyperglycemia Through Weight Loss and FGF21 Dependent Mechanisms.FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology · 2026Article
- Extended-Release Trazodone in Comorbid Major Depressive and Sedative-Hypnotic/Anxiolytic Use Disorders: A Real-World Preliminary Evaluation of Multidimensional Outcomes.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Serotonin reuptake inhibiting antidepressants: A trigger for visual snow syndrome?The International journal of risk & safety in medicine · 2026Article
- Antidepressant prescribing pattern in Croatia: a retrospective, longitudinal study from 2017 to 2022.Croatian medical journal · 2026Article
- Antidepressant prescribing patterns and patient-reported adverse effects: a cross-sectional study from Pakistan.Annals of general psychiatry · 2026Article
- Patients' Perspectives on Antidepressant Discontinuation and the Pharmacists' Role.Basic & clinical pharmacology & toxicology · 2026Article
- Antidepressant prescribing trends for adult patients in the UK and Ireland during the COVID-19 pandemic: systematic review.BJPsych open · 2026Review
- Trends in Sedative-Hypnotic Prescription Among Insomnia Patients: A Nationwide Cohort Study From 2010 to 2022 in Korea.Journal of Korean medical science · 2026Article
- Review
- Effect of a Combined Antidepressant Drug Flupentixol-Melitracen on Glucose Level and Expression of Insulin-Like Peptide Genes DILP5 and DILP6 in Drosophila melanogaster.BioMed research international · 2026Article
- Patterns of antidepressant prescribing around pregnancy: a descriptive analysis using Clinical Practice Research Datalink GOLD.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2026Article
- Understanding Target-Specific Effects of Antidepressant Drug Pollution on Molluscs: A Systematic Review Report.Toxics · 2025Review
- Development and administration of the flexible adapted cognitive test battery for schizophrenia (FACTS).Schizophrenia research. Cognition · 2025Article
- Benzodiazepines interfere with the efficacy of pembrolizumab-based cancer immunotherapy. Results of a nationwide cohort study including over 50,000 participants with advanced lung cancer.Oncoimmunology · 2025Article
- Article
- Critical insights into the potential risks of antipsychotic drugs to fish, including through effects on behaviour.Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo describe the trends in use of antidepressants (ADs), atypical antipsychotics (AAPs), and benzodiazepines (BZDs) among high-, middle-, and low-income countries.
methodsA cross-sectional time-series analysis by country from July 2014 to December 2019 utilizing IQVIA's Multinational Integrated Data Analysis database was conducted. Population-controlled rates of use were calculated in number of standard units of medications per drug class per population size. The United Nations' 2020 World Economic Situation and Prospects was used to group countries into high-, middle-, and low-income. Percent change in rates of use per drug class was calculated from July 2014 to July 2019. Linear regression analyses were conducted to assess the predictability of percent change in use utilizing a country's baseline rate of use per drug class and economic status as predictor variables.
resultsA total of 64 countries were included: 33 high-, 6 middle-, and 25 low-income. Average baseline rates of use for ADs in high-, middle-, and low-income countries were 2.15, 0.35, and 0.38 standard units per population size, respectively. For AAPs, rates were 0.69, 0.15, and 0.13, respectively. For BZDs, rates were 1.66, 1.46, and 0.33, respectively. Average percent changes in use for ADs by economic status were 20%, 69%, and 42%, respectively. For AAPs, they were 27%, 78%, and 69%, respectively. For BZDs, they were -13%, 4%, and -5%, respectively. Some associations were found demonstrating that as a country's economic status increases, percent change of AD (p = 0.916), AAP (p = 0.23), and BZD (p = 0.027) use decreases. Similarly, as baseline rate of use for ADs and AAPs increases, percent change in use decreases with p-values of 0.026 and 0.054, respectively. For BZDs, as baseline rate of use increases, percent change in use increases (p = 0.038).
conclusionsHigh-income countries have a higher rate of treatment utilization compared to low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) with treatment utilization increasing in all countries of interest.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.