Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37099363›Full record

ArticleJMIR formative research2023

An Integrative Engagement Model of Digital Psychotherapy: Exploratory Focus Group Findings.

James M Zech, Morgan Johnson, Michael D Pullmann, Thomas D Hull, Tim Althoff, Sean A Munson, Nicole Fridling, Boris Litvin, Jerilyn Wu, Patricia A Areán

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR formative research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04507360 (Enhancing Engagement With Digital Mental Health Care), which is not on this map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04507360 nacompletednot on this map

Enhancing Engagement With Digital Mental Health Care

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of WashingtonRan2021 to 2024Enrolled78,390ConditionsEngagement, PatientArmsStudy 1, Demographics Survey, Study 1, Next Steps Survey, Study 1, Generic Response, Study 1, Generic Resources, Study 1, Tailored Response
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Investigating the Role of Situational Disruptors in Engagement with Digital Mental Health Tools.CSCW : proceedings of the Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work. Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work · 2025
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

James M ZechTalkspace, New York, NY, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8726-1884
Morgan JohnsonDepartment of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2081-6176
Michael D PullmannDepartment of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8404-864X
Thomas D HullTalkspace, New York, NY, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8275-6765
Tim AlthoffAllen School of Computer Science & Engineering, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4793-2289
Sean A MunsonDepartment of Human Centered Design & Engineering, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0472-6138
Nicole FridlingTalkspace, New York, NY, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3647-0181
Boris LitvinTalkspace, New York, NY, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4710-8417
Jerilyn WuTalkspace, New York, NY, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2576-4456
Patricia A AreánDepartment of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5971-6319
University of Washington · USFlorida State University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDigital mental health interventions, such as 2-way and asynchronous messaging therapy, are a growing part of the mental health care treatment ecosystem, yet little is known about how users engage with these interventions over the course of their treatment journeys. User engagement, or client behaviors and therapeutic relationships that facilitate positive treatment outcomes, is a necessary condition for the effectiveness of any digital treatment. Developing a better understanding of the factors that impact user engagement can impact the overall effectiveness of digital psychotherapy. Mapping the user experience in digital therapy may be facilitated by integrating theories from several fields. Specifically, health science's Health Action Process Approach and human-computer interaction's Lived Informatics Model may be usefully synthesized with relational constructs from psychotherapy process-outcome research to identify the determinants of engagement in digital messaging therapy.

objectiveThis study aims to capture insights into digital therapy users' engagement patterns through a qualitative analysis of focus group sessions. We aimed to synthesize emergent intrapersonal and relational determinants of engagement into an integrative framework of engagement in digital therapy.

methodsA total of 24 focus group participants were recruited to participate in 1 of 5 synchronous focus group sessions held between October and November 2021. Participant responses were coded by 2 researchers using thematic analysis.

resultsCoders identified 10 relevant constructs and 24 subconstructs that can collectively account for users' engagement and experience trajectories in the context of digital therapy. Although users' engagement trajectories in digital therapy varied widely, they were principally informed by intrapsychic factors (eg, self-efficacy and outcome expectancy), interpersonal factors (eg, the therapeutic alliance and its rupture), and external factors (eg, treatment costs and social support). These constructs were organized into a proposed Integrative Engagement Model of Digital Psychotherapy. Notably, every participant in the focus groups indicated that their ability to connect with their therapist was among the most important factors that were considered in continuing or terminating treatment.

conclusionsEngagement in messaging therapy may be usefully approached through an interdisciplinary lens, linking constructs from health science, human-computer interaction studies, and clinical science in an integrative engagement framework. Taken together, our results suggest that users may not view the digital psychotherapy platform itself as a treatment so much as a means of gaining access to a helping provider, that is, users did not see themselves as engaging with a platform but instead viewed their experience as a healing relationship. The findings of this study suggest that a better understanding of user engagement is crucial for enhancing the effectiveness of digital mental health interventions, and future research should continue to explore the underlying factors that contribute to engagement in digital mental health interventions.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT04507360; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04507360.

Indexed as

digital engagementHealth Action Process Approachlived informaticsmessaging therapy

Identifiers

PMID37099363
PMCPMC10173033
OpenAlexW4322583975

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.