Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37099249›Full record

ArticleNursing open2023

Factors associated with compassion fatigue and compassion satisfaction in obstetrics and gynaecology nurses: A cross-sectional study.

Jia Wang, Mei Su, Wenzhong Chang, Yuchong Hu, Yujia Ma, Peijuan Tang, Jiaxin Sun

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nursing open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
7.9field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Jia WangDepartment of Gynaecology, Inner Mongolia People's Hospital, Hohhot, China.ORCID 0000-0002-3465-4382
Mei SuDepartment of Gynaecology, Inner Mongolia People's Hospital, Hohhot, China.
Wenzhong ChangDepartment of Gynaecology, Inner Mongolia People's Hospital, Hohhot, China.
Yuchong HuDepartment of Gynaecology, Inner Mongolia People's Hospital, Hohhot, China.
Yujia MaSTD/AIDS Prevention and Control Section, Tongliao Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Tongliao, China.
Peijuan TangDepartment of Gynaecology, Inner Mongolia People's Hospital, Hohhot, China.
Jiaxin SunDepartment of Clinical Medical Research Center, Affiliated Hospital of Inner Mongolia Medical University, Hohhot, China.ORCID 0000-0001-9288-0284
Inner Mongolia People's Hospital · CNInner Mongolia Medical University · CNTongliao Academy of Agricultural Sciences · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsTo examine the factors influencing compassion fatigue and compassion satisfaction in obstetrics and gynaecology nurses and to explore the combined results of multiple factors.

designAn online cross-sectional study was conducted. REVIEW

methodsData were collected from 311 nurses using a convenience sampling method from January to February 2022. Stepwise multiple linear regression analysis and mediation tests were performed.

resultsCompassion fatigue in obstetrics and gynaecology nurses was in the moderate to high levels. Physical status, number of children, emotional labour, lack of professional efficacy, emotional exhaustion and the none-only-child can influence compassion fatigue; lack of professional efficacy, cynicism, social support, work experience, employment status and night shift were predictive of compassion satisfaction. Social support partially mediated between lack of professional efficacy and compassion fatigue/compassion satisfaction; emotional labour moderated in the mediated analysis model.

conclusionModerate to high levels of compassion fatigue was present in 75.88% of obstetrics and gynaecology nurses. Some factors affect compassion fatigue and compassion satisfaction. Thus, nursing managers should consider factors and construct a monitoring system to reduce compassion fatigue and improve compassion satisfaction. IMPLICATIONS FOR THE PROFESSION: The results will provide a theoretical basis for improving job satisfaction and the quality of care in obstetrics and gynaecology nurses. And this may raise concerns about the occupational health of obstetrics and gynaecology nurses in China. REPORTING

methodThe study was reported according to the STROBE. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: The nurses spent time filling out the questionnaires during the data collection phase and answered the questions sincerely. WHAT DOES THIS ARTICLE CONTRIBUTE TO THE WIDER GLOBAL CLINICAL COMMUNITY?: Obstetrics and gynaecology nurses with 4-16 years of experience are prone to experience compassion fatigue. The effect of lack of professional efficacy on compassion fatigue and compassion satisfaction can be improved by social support. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: Reducing nurse compassion fatigue and improving compassion satisfaction are important for providing quality nursing care to obstetrics and gynaecology patients. In addition, clarifying the influencing factors of compassion fatigue and compassion satisfaction can improve nurses' work efficiency and job satisfaction, and provide theoretical guidance for managers to implement interventions.

Indexed as

Burnout, ProfessionalCompassion FatigueGynecologyNursesObstetricsCross-Sectional StudiesEmpathyHumansJob SatisfactionPersonal Satisfactioncompassion fatiguecompassion satisfactioninfluencing factorsmediating effectobstetrics and gynaecology

Identifiers

PMID37099249
PMCPMC10333879
OpenAlexW4367047769

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.