Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37099243›Full record

ReviewCurrent oncology reports2023

Rational Alternatives to Fludarabine and Cyclophosphamide-Based Pre-CAR Lymphodepleting Regimens in the Pediatric and Young Adult B-ALL Setting.

Sean Green, Liora Schultz

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current oncology reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Sean GreenDepartment of Pediatrics, Stanford University, 1000 Welch Road, Suite #300, Palo Alto, CA, 94304, USA.
Liora SchultzDepartment of Pediatrics, Stanford University, 1000 Welch Road, Suite #300, Palo Alto, CA, 94304, USA. lioras@stanford.edu.ORCID 0000-0001-9512-7597
Children's Health Council · USStanford University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewLymphodepleting chemotherapy (LD) has emerged as a key determinant of chimeric antigen receptor T cell (CAR) efficacy across pediatric/adult B cell malignancies. Clinical trials demonstrate the superiority of fludarabine/cyclophosphamide (Flu/Cy) regimens, resulting in the adoption of Flu/Cy as the pre-CAR LD standard. In the context of a global fludarabine shortage, consideration of alternative regimens is timely, yet limited clinical data exists, specifically in the pediatric B-ALL CAR setting. RECENT

findingsBendamustine has been used as an effective LD prior to CD19-CAR in adult lymphoma. Although use in the pediatric CAR setting is limited, tolerability has been established in pediatric Hodgkin's lymphoma. Clofarabine is a purine nucleoside analog with mechanistic overlap with fludarabine; however, toxicity is high in the upfront leukemia setting, and thus use as an LD pre-CAR should be pursued with caution. We review the experience using bendamustine and clofarabine to serve as a resource when considering LD regimens as an alternative to fludarabine for pediatric B-ALL.

Indexed as

Burkitt LymphomaReceptors, Chimeric AntigenBendamustine HydrochlorideChildClofarabineCyclophosphamideHumansImmunotherapy, AdoptiveReceptors, Antigen, T-CellVidarabineYoung AdultBendamustine HydrochlorideClofarabineCyclophosphamidefludarabineReceptors, Antigen, T-CellReceptors, Chimeric AntigenVidarabineBendamustineCAR T cellsClofarabineFludarabineLymphodepletionPediatric B-acute lymphoblastic leukemia

Identifiers

PMID37099243
OpenAlexW4367047766

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.