Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37099210›Full record

Trial reportLasers in medical science2023

Whole-body photobiomodulation improves post-exercise recovery but does not affect performance or physiological response during maximal anaerobic cycling.

Jillian D Forsey, Justin J Merrigan, Jason D Stone, Mark D Stephenson, Jad Ramadan, Scott M Galster, Randall W Bryner, Joshua A Hagen

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Lasers in medical science, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Jillian D ForseyHuman Performance Innovation Center, Rockefeller Neuroscience Institute, School of Medicine, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV, USA.
Justin J MerriganHuman Performance Innovation Center, Rockefeller Neuroscience Institute, School of Medicine, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV, USA.
Jason D StoneHuman Performance Innovation Center, Rockefeller Neuroscience Institute, School of Medicine, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV, USA.
Mark D StephensonCenter for Sports Performance and Research, Mass General Brigham, Boston, MA, USA.
Jad RamadanHuman Performance Innovation Center, Rockefeller Neuroscience Institute, School of Medicine, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV, USA.
Scott M GalsterHuman Performance Innovation Center, Rockefeller Neuroscience Institute, School of Medicine, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV, USA.
Randall W BrynerExercise Physiology Department, West Virginia University, WV, Morgantown, USA.
Joshua A HagenHuman Performance Innovation Center, Rockefeller Neuroscience Institute, School of Medicine, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV, USA. hagen.112@osu.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2829-1191

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study aims to examine the effects of acute whole-body photobiomodulation (wbPBM), applied pre-exercise, on bouts of anaerobic cycling (Wingate) performances. Forty-eight healthy, active males and females participated in this single-blind, randomized, crossover study. Participants visited the laboratory three times to complete repeat (4 ×) Wingate testing, with one week between each visit. All participants completed baseline testing during their first visit and randomly received either the wbPBM or placebo condition before testing on the second visit, followed by the opposite condition on the third visit. There were no significant condition × time interactions for any variable (peak power, average power, power decrement, lactate, heart rate, ratings of perceived exertion, heart rate variability (HRV), root-mean square of differences between R-R intervals (rMSSD), power in the high-frequency range (HF) average, power in the low-frequency range (LF) average, total power, LF/HF, or power in the very-low-frequency range average). A main condition effect was only noted for heart rate, where peak heart rate was significantly higher for wbPBM (145, 141-148 bpm) than placebo (143, 139-146 bpm; p = 0.006) and baseline testing (143, 140-146; p = 0.049) throughout the entire testing session (i.e., collapsed across all timepoints). Furthermore, HRV (rMSSD) the following morning after testing was significantly higher for the wbPBM session compared to placebo (p = 0.043). There were no differences in perceived recovery (p = 0.713) or stress (p = 0.978) scores between wbPBM and placebo. Implementing 20 min of wbPBM immediately prior to maximal bouts of anaerobic cycling did not improve performance (i.e., power output) or physiological responses (e.g., lactate). However, wbPBM elicited the ability to work at a higher heart rate throughout testing and seemed to enhance recovery through improved HRV the following morning.

Indexed as

BicyclingLactic AcidAnaerobiosisCross-Over StudiesFemaleHeart RateHumansMaleSingle-Blind MethodLactic AcidFatigueHeart rate variabilityMuscle sorenessPower outputRed and near-infrared light therapyWingate test

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.