Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37099179›Full record

ArticleIn vitro cellular & developmental biology. Animal2023

Production of MSTN knockout porcine cells using adenine base-editing-mediated exon skipping.

Shuai-Peng Yang, Xiang-Xing Zhu, Zi-Xiao Qu, Cai-Yue Chen, Yao-Bing Wu, Yue Wu, Zi-Dan Luo, Xin-Yi Wang, Chu-Yu He, Jia-Wen Fang and 11 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in In vitro cellular & developmental biology. Animal, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Efficient and Safe Knockout ofVeterinary sciences · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Shuai-Peng Yang *Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Animal Molecular Design and Precise Breeding, School of Life Sciences and Engineering, Foshan University, Foshan, 528225, China.
Xiang-Xing Zhu *Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Animal Molecular Design and Precise Breeding, School of Life Sciences and Engineering, Foshan University, Foshan, 528225, China. zhu_xiangxing@126.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5265-2620
Zi-Xiao QuGuangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Animal Molecular Design and Precise Breeding, School of Life Sciences and Engineering, Foshan University, Foshan, 528225, China.
Cai-Yue ChenGene Editing Technology Center of Guangdong Province, School of Medicine, Foshan University, Foshan, 528225, China.
Yao-Bing WuGene Editing Technology Center of Guangdong Province, School of Medicine, Foshan University, Foshan, 528225, China.
Yue WuGene Editing Technology Center of Guangdong Province, School of Medicine, Foshan University, Foshan, 528225, China.
Zi-Dan LuoGene Editing Technology Center of Guangdong Province, School of Medicine, Foshan University, Foshan, 528225, China.
Xin-Yi WangGene Editing Technology Center of Guangdong Province, School of Medicine, Foshan University, Foshan, 528225, China.
Chu-Yu HeGene Editing Technology Center of Guangdong Province, School of Medicine, Foshan University, Foshan, 528225, China.
Jia-Wen FangGene Editing Technology Center of Guangdong Province, School of Medicine, Foshan University, Foshan, 528225, China.
Ling-Qi WangGene Editing Technology Center of Guangdong Province, School of Medicine, Foshan University, Foshan, 528225, China.
Guang-Long HongGene Editing Technology Center of Guangdong Province, School of Medicine, Foshan University, Foshan, 528225, China.
Shu-Tao ZhengGene Editing Technology Center of Guangdong Province, School of Medicine, Foshan University, Foshan, 528225, China.
Jie-Mei ZengGene Editing Technology Center of Guangdong Province, School of Medicine, Foshan University, Foshan, 528225, China.
Ai-Fen YanGene Editing Technology Center of Guangdong Province, School of Medicine, Foshan University, Foshan, 528225, China.
Juan FengGene Editing Technology Center of Guangdong Province, School of Medicine, Foshan University, Foshan, 528225, China.
Lian LiuGene Editing Technology Center of Guangdong Province, School of Medicine, Foshan University, Foshan, 528225, China.
Xiao-Li ZhangGene Editing Technology Center of Guangdong Province, School of Medicine, Foshan University, Foshan, 528225, China.
Li-Gang ZhangGene Editing Technology Center of Guangdong Province, School of Medicine, Foshan University, Foshan, 528225, China.
Kai MiaoCentre for Precision Medicine Research and Training, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Macau, Macau SAR, China. kaimiao@um.edu.mo.
Dong-Sheng TangGuangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Animal Molecular Design and Precise Breeding, School of Life Sciences and Engineering, Foshan University, Foshan, 528225, China. tangdsh@163.com.
Foshan University · CNUniversity of Macau · MO

Funding

Guangdong Basic and Applied Basic Research Fund 2021A1515220078Guangdong Provincial R&D Project in Key Areas 2022B0202110002Special Project in Key Fields of Guangdong Provincal Universities 2021ZDZX2050the National Key R&D Plan of China 2021YFA0805901the National Natural Science Foundation of China 81900775the National Natural Science Foundation of China 82070199
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gene-knockout pigs have important applications in agriculture and medicine. Compared with CRISPR/Cas9 and cytosine base editing (CBE) technologies, adenine base editing (ABE) shows better safety and accuracy in gene modification. However, because of the characteristics of gene sequences, the ABE system cannot be widely used in gene knockout. Alternative splicing of mRNA is an important biological mechanism in eukaryotes for the formation of proteins with different functional activities. The splicing apparatus recognizes conserved sequences of the 5' end splice donor and 3' end splice acceptor motifs of introns in pre-mRNA that can trigger exon skipping, leading to the production of new functional proteins, or causing gene inactivation through frameshift mutations. This study aimed to construct a MSTN knockout pig by inducing exon skipping with the aid of the ABE system to expand the application of the ABE system for the preparation of knockout pigs. In this study, first, we constructed ABEmaxAW and ABE8eV106W plasmid vectors and found that their editing efficiencies at the targets were at least sixfold and even 260-fold higher than that of ABEmaxAW by contrasting the editing efficiencies at the gene targets of endogenous CD163, IGF2, and MSTN in pigs. Subsequently, we used the ABE8eV106W system to realize adenine base (the base of the antisense strand is thymine) editing of the conserved splice donor sequence (5'-GT) of intron 2 of the porcine MSTN gene. A porcine single-cell clone carrying a homozygous mutation (5'-GC) in the conserved sequence (5'-GT) of the intron 2 splice donor of the MSTN gene was successfully generated after drug selection. Unfortunately, the MSTN gene was not expressed and, therefore, could not be characterized at this level. No detectable genomic off-target edits were identified by Sanger sequencing. In this study, we verified that the ABE8eV106W vector had higher editing efficiency and could expand the editing scope of ABE. Additionally, we successfully achieved the precise modification of the alternative splice acceptor of intron 2 of the porcine MSTN gene, which may provide a new strategy for gene knockout in pigs.

Indexed as

AdenineGene EditingAnimalsExonsGene Knockout TechniquesMutationSwineAdenineAdenine base editor (ABE)Exon skippingGene-knockoutMyostatin (MSTN)Pig genetic improvement

Identifiers

PMID37099179
OpenAlexW4367047676

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.