ArticleEuropean radiology2023
Differentiation of benign versus malignant indistinguishable vertebral compression fractures by different machine learning with MRI-based radiomic features.
Article in European radiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Machine learning-based risk predictive model for postoperative refractures in patients with osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures: a systematic review and critical appraisal.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2026Pooled it
- Artificial intelligence in risk prediction and diagnosis of vertebral fractures.Scientific reports · 2024Pooled it
- Multicenter evaluation of four large language models for automated spine imaging diagnosis.NPJ digital medicine · 2026Article
- CT-based machine learning radiomics modeling to screen for lumbar spine osteoporosis.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Deep Learning-Assisted Radiomics for Predicting Thoracolumbar Osteoporotic Vertebral Fractures.Clinical interventions in aging · 2026Article
- Radiomics in spinal research: a narrative review.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026Review
- The Application of Artificial Intelligence in Spine Surgery: A Scoping Review.Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. Global research & reviews · 2025Article
- Interpretable Machine Learning Model to Predict Bone Cement Leakage in Percutaneous Vertebral Augmentation for Osteoporotic Vertebral Compression Fracture Based on SHapley Additive exPlanations.Global spine journal · 2025Article
- CT-based radiomics predicts adjacent vertebral fracture after percutaneous vertebral augmentation.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2025Article
- Bone metastases from endocrine cancer: advances in diagnosis, treatment, and prevention.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2025Review
- MRI-based 2.5D deep learning radiomics nomogram for the differentiation of benign versus malignant vertebral compression fractures.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
- Novel Transfer Learning Approach for Detecting Infected and Healthy Maize Crop Using Leaf Images.Food science & nutrition · 2025Article
- A multi-scene deep learning model for automated segmentation of acute vertebral compression fractures from radiographs: a multicenter cohort study.Insights into imaging · 2024Article
- Radiomics Based on Multimodal magnetic resonance imaging for the Differential Diagnosis of Benign and Malignant Vertebral Compression Fractures.Orthopaedic surgery · 2024Article
- Deep learning-based automated high-accuracy location and identification of fresh vertebral compression fractures from spinal radiographs: a multicenter cohort study.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2024Article
- Determining rib fracture age from CT scans with a radiomics-based combined model: a multicenter retrospective study.Insights into imaging · 2023Article
- Value ofEJNMMI research · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesTo explore an optimal machine learning (ML) model trained on MRI-based radiomic features to differentiate benign from malignant indistinguishable vertebral compression fractures (VCFs).
methodsThis retrospective study included patients within 6 weeks of back pain (non-traumatic) who underwent MRI and were diagnosed with benign and malignant indistinguishable VCFs. The two cohorts were retrospectively recruited from the Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University (QUH) and Qinghai Red Cross Hospital (QRCH). Three hundred seventy-six participants from QUH were divided into the training (n = 263) and validation (n = 113) cohort based on the date of MRI examination. One hundred three participants from QRCH were used to evaluate the external generalizability of our prediction models. A total of 1045 radiomic features were extracted from each region of interest (ROI) and used to establish the models. The prediction models were established based on 7 different classifiers.
resultsThese models showed favorable efficacy in differentiating benign from malignant indistinguishable VCFs. However, our Gaussian naïve Bayes (GNB) model attained higher AUC and accuracy (0.86, 87.61%) than the other classifiers in validation cohort. It also remains the high accuracy and sensitivity for the external test cohort.
conclusionsOur GNB model performed better than the other models in the present study, suggesting that it may be more useful for differentiating indistinguishable benign form malignant VCFs. KEY POINTS: • The differential diagnosis of benign and malignant indistinguishable VCFs based on MRI is rather difficult for spine surgeons or radiologists. • Our ML models facilitate the differential diagnosis of benign and malignant indistinguishable VCFs with improved diagnostic efficacy. • Our GNB model had the high accuracy and sensitivity for clinical application.
Indexed as
Identifiers
37099176What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.