Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37099175›Full record

ArticleEuropean radiology2023

Development and validation of a deep learning model for prediction of intracranial aneurysm rupture risk based on multi-omics factor.

Mirzat Turhon, Mengxing Li, Huibin Kang, Jiliang Huang, Fujunhui Zhang, Ying Zhang, Yisen Zhang, Aierpati Maimaiti, Dilmurat Gheyret, Aximujiang Axier and 3 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European radiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
7.6field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Systematic Review of Radiomics and Artificial Intelligence in Intracranial Aneurysm Management.Journal of neuroimaging : official journal of the American Society of Neuroimaging
    Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Mirzat TurhonDepartment of Interventional Neuroradiology, Beijing Neurosurgical Institute, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100070, People's Republic of China.
Mengxing LiDepartment of Interventional Neuroradiology, Beijing Neurosurgical Institute, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100070, People's Republic of China.
Huibin KangDepartment of Interventional Neuroradiology, Beijing Neurosurgical Institute, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100070, People's Republic of China.
Jiliang HuangDepartment of Interventional Neuroradiology, Beijing Neurosurgical Institute, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100070, People's Republic of China.
Fujunhui ZhangDepartment of Interventional Neuroradiology, Beijing Neurosurgical Institute, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100070, People's Republic of China.
Ying ZhangDepartment of Interventional Neuroradiology, Beijing Neurosurgical Institute, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100070, People's Republic of China.
Yisen ZhangDepartment of Interventional Neuroradiology, Beijing Neurosurgical Institute, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100070, People's Republic of China.
Aierpati MaimaitiDepartment of Neurosurgery, Xinjiang Medical University Affiliated First Hospital, Urumqi, Xinjiang, 840017, People's Republic of China.
Dilmurat GheyretDepartment of Neurosurgery, Xinjiang Medical University Affiliated First Hospital, Urumqi, Xinjiang, 840017, People's Republic of China.
Aximujiang AxierDepartment of Neurosurgery, Xinjiang Medical University Affiliated First Hospital, Urumqi, Xinjiang, 840017, People's Republic of China.
Miamaitili AishaDepartment of Neurosurgery, Xinjiang Medical University Affiliated First Hospital, Urumqi, Xinjiang, 840017, People's Republic of China. mmtaili@aliyun.com.
Xinjian YangDepartment of Interventional Neuroradiology, Beijing Neurosurgical Institute, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100070, People's Republic of China. yangxinjian@voiceoftiantan.org.
Jian LiuDepartment of Interventional Neuroradiology, Beijing Neurosurgical Institute, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100070, People's Republic of China. jianliu_ns@163.com.
Capital Medical University · CNBeijing Tian Tan Hospital · CNFirst Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University · CNXinjiang Medical University · CN

Funding

Beijing Municipal Administration of Hospitals Incubating Program PX022022National Natural Science Foundation of China 82072036National Natural Science Foundation of China 82272092Research Projects of National Health Commission Capacity Building and Continuing Education Center in 2021 GWJJ2021100103
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe clinical ability of radiomics to predict intracranial aneurysm rupture risk remains unexplored. This study aims to investigate the potential uses of radiomics and explore whether deep learning (DL) algorithms outperform traditional statistical methods in predicting aneurysm rupture risk.

methodsThis retrospective study included 1740 patients with 1809 intracranial aneurysms confirmed by digital subtraction angiography at two hospitals in China from January 2014 to December 2018. We randomly divided the dataset (hospital 1) into training (80%) and internal validation (20%). External validation was performed using independent data collected from hospital 2. The prediction models were developed based on clinical, aneurysm morphological, and radiomics parameters by logistic regression (LR). Additionally, the DL model for predicting aneurysm rupture risk using integration parameters was developed and compared with other models.

resultsThe AUCs of LR models A (clinical), B (morphological), and C (radiomics) were 0.678, 0.708, and 0.738, respectively (all p < 0.05). The AUCs of the combined feature models D (clinical and morphological), E (clinical and radiomics), and F (clinical, morphological, and radiomics) were 0.771, 0.839, and 0.849, respectively. The DL model (AUC = 0.929) outperformed the machine learning (ML) (AUC = 0.878) and the LR models (AUC = 0.849). Also, the DL model has shown good performance in the external validation datasets (AUC: 0.876 vs 0.842 vs 0.823, respectively).

conclusionRadiomics signatures play an important role in predicting aneurysm rupture risk. DL methods outperformed conventional statistical methods in prediction models for the rupture risk of unruptured intracranial aneurysms, integrating clinical, aneurysm morphological, and radiomics parameters. KEY POINTS: • Radiomics parameters are associated with the rupture risk of intracranial aneurysms. • The prediction model based on integrating parameters in the deep learning model was significantly better than a conventional model. • The radiomics signature proposed in this study could guide clinicians in selecting appropriate patients for preventive treatment.

Indexed as

Aneurysm, RupturedDeep LearningIntracranial AneurysmHumansMultiomicsRetrospective StudiesDeep learningIntracranial aneurysmStroke

Identifiers

PMID37099175
OpenAlexW4367047817

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.