ReviewDer Nervenarzt2023
[What does the population know about risk and protective factors for dementia? An international review of the current state of knowledge in various countries].
Review in Der Nervenarzt, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Gaps in dementia knowledge: a nationwide study of public awareness and misconceptions in Bulgaria.Psychogeriatrics : the official journal of the Japanese Psychogeriatric Society · 2025Article
- [Brain check-up: a structured approach diagnosing mild cognitive impairment in the primary care setting].Zeitschrift fur Gerontologie und Geriatrie · 2024Article
- [Digital information materials on dementia-an exploratory content analysis].Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz · 2024Article
- Methotrexate and the Risk of Dementia: A Two-Sample Mendelian Randomization Study.Neurology and therapy · 2024Article
- Older adults' awareness of modifiable risk and protective factors for dementia and interest in eHealth interventions for brain health: a comparison between the Netherlands and Germany.BMC public health · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe scientific state of knowledge on modifiable risk factors for dementia has greatly improved in recent years. The established risk and protective factors include physical and social inactivity, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, excessive alcohol consumption and smoking; however, it is assumed that this knowledge is so far insufficiently disseminated among the general population, indicating untapped potential for primary prevention of dementia.
objectiveTo assess the state of knowledge on established risk and protective factors for dementia in the general population. MATERIAL AND
methodsBased on a systematic literature search in the PubMed database, international studies that investigated the knowledge on modifiable risk and/or protective factors for dementia in samples from the general population were identified. RESULTS AND
conclusionA total of 21 publications were included in the review. The majority of publications (n = 17) collated risk and protective factors using closed questions, while n = 4 studies used open questions. Lifestyle factors, e.g. cognitive, social and physical activity, were most frequently named as protective against dementia. Furthermore, many participants recognized depression as a risk factor for dementia. Knowledge of cardiovascular risk constellations for dementia, such as hypertension, hypercholesterolemia or diabetes mellitus were much less known among the participants. The results indicate that there is a need for a targeted clarification of the role of pre-existing cardiovascular diseases as risk factors for dementia. Studies assessing the state of knowledge on social and environmental risk and protective factors for dementia are currently scarce.
Indexed as
Identifiers
37099170What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.