ArticleExperimental brain research2023
Age-related effects of repeated task switching in a novel voluntary gait adaptability task.
Article in Experimental brain research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Age-related effects of task switching have been extensively studied based on cognitive tasks and simple motor tasks, but less on complex cognitive-motor tasks involving dynamic balance control while walking. The latter tasks may especially be difficult and relevant for older adults in terms of safe mobility in daily life. The aim of the present study was, therefore, to examine age-related changes in task-switching adaptability using a novel voluntary gait adaptability test protocol. Fifteen healthy young (27.5 ± 2.9 years) and 16 healthy old (70.9 ± 7.6 years) adults carried out 2 different visual target stepping tasks (either target avoidance or stepping) twice in a block (A-B-A-B, 2 min per task; three blocks in total) without any intrablock breaks. Our results showed that old adults showed significantly more step errors both in Tasks A and B as well as more interference effects than young adults. Age-related differences in step accuracy were significant in the anterior-posterior direction both in Task A and B but not in the mediolateral direction. Both in step errors and accuracy, no interaction effects of age and trial were shown. Our results suggest that old adults could not cope with rapid and direct task changes in our voluntary gait adaptability task as young adults. Since the significant main effect of trial for Task B, but not Task A appears to be due to different task complexity, further studies may determine the effect of task complexity or task switch timing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.