Observational studyMolecular diagnosis & therapy2023
Dynamic ctDNA Mutational Complexity in Patients with Melanoma Receiving Immunotherapy.
Observational study in Molecular diagnosis & therapy, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Circulating Tumor DNA in Melanoma: Advances in Detection, Clinical Applications, and Integration with Emerging Technologies.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- [Appropriate Duration of First-line Immunotherapy for Advanced NSCLC and Predictive Factors].Zhongguo fei ai za zhi = Chinese journal of lung cancer · 2026Review
- Circulating tumor DNA to monitor treatment response in solid tumors and advance precision oncology.NPJ precision oncology · 2025Review
- Detection of Circulating Tumor DNA in Liquid Biopsy: Current Techniques and Potential Applications in Melanoma.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Dynamics of blood microsatellite instability (bMSI) burden predicts outcome of a patient treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors: a case report of hyperprogressive disease.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Article
- Circulating tumor DNA laboratory processes and clinical applications in nasopharyngeal carcinoma.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Review
- Detection of multiple activating NRAS variants under BRAF/MEK-inhibitor therapy in BRAF positive malignant melanoma using liquid biopsy.JAAD case reports · 2024Article
- Harnessing ctDNA in Advanced Melanoma: A Promising Tool for Informed Clinical Decisions.Cancers · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCirculating tumour DNA (ctDNA) analysis promises to improve the clinical care of people with cancer, address health inequities and guide translational research. This observational cohort study used ctDNA to follow 29 patients with advanced-stage cutaneous melanoma through multiple cycles of immunotherapy.
methodA melanoma-specific ctDNA next-generation sequencing (NGS) panel, droplet digital polymerase chain reaction (ddPCR) and mass spectrometry analysis were used to identify ctDNA mutations in longitudinal blood plasma samples from Aotearoa New Zealand (NZ) patients receiving immunotherapy for melanoma. These technologies were used in conjunction to identify the breadth and complexity of tumour genomic information that ctDNA analysis can reliably report.
resultsDuring the course of immunotherapy treatment, a high level of dynamic mutational complexity was identified in blood plasma, including multiple BRAF mutations in the same patient, clinically relevant BRAF mutations emerging through therapy and co-occurring sub-clonal BRAF and NRAS mutations. The technical validity of this ctDNA analysis was supported by high sample analysis-reanalysis concordance, as well as concordance between different ctDNA measurement technologies. In addition, we observed > 90% concordance in the detection of ctDNA when using cell-stabilising collection tubes followed by 7-day delayed processing, compared with standard EDTA blood collection protocols with rapid processing. We also found that the undetectability of ctDNA at a proportion of treatment cycles was associated with durable clinical benefit (DCB).
conclusionWe found that multiple ctDNA processing and analysis methods consistently identified complex longitudinal patterns of clinically relevant mutations, adding support for expanded clinical trials of this technology in a variety of oncology settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.