Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37098957›Full record

ReviewJournal of bacteriology2023

The Pseudomonas aeruginosa Biofilm Matrix Protein CdrA Has Similarities to Other Fibrillar Adhesin Proteins.

Courtney Reichhardt

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of bacteriology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
4.9field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. UnderstandingMicroorganisms · 2026
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Biofilm · 2024
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. An apparent lack of synergy between degradative enzymes againstbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Courtney ReichhardtDepartment of Chemistry, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.
Washington University in St. Louis · US

Funding

Functionality of CdrA and its processed forms within Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilmsR00GM134121 · NIGMS · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI REICHHARDT, COURTNEY · 2021 to 2023
$747k
NIGMS NIH HHS R00 GM134121
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The ability of bacteria to adhere to each other and both biotic and abiotic surfaces is key to biofilm formation, and one way that bacteria adhere is using fibrillar adhesins. Fibrillar adhesins share several key characteristics, including (i) they are extracellular, surface-associated proteins, (ii) they contain an adhesive domain as well as a repetitive stalk domain, and (iii) they are either a monomer or homotrimer (i.e., identical, coiled-coil) of a high molecular weight protein. Pseudomonas aeruginosa uses the fibrillar adhesin called CdrA to promote bacterial aggregation and biofilm formation. Here, the current literature on CdrA is reviewed, including its transcriptional and posttranslational regulation by the second messenger c-di-GMP as well as what is known about its structure and ability to interact with other molecules. I highlight its similarities to other fibrillar adhesins and discuss open questions that remain to be answered toward a better understanding of CdrA.

Indexed as

Extracellular Polymeric Substance MatrixPseudomonas aeruginosaAdhesins, BacterialBacteriaBacterial ProteinsBiofilmsCyclic GMPGene Expression Regulation, BacterialAdhesins, BacterialBacterial ProteinsCyclic GMPbiofilmsCdrAfibrillar adhesinPseudomonas aeruginosa

Identifiers

PMID37098957
PMCPMC10210978
OpenAlexW4367047930

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.