Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37098692›Full record

ArticleJournal of veterinary internal medicine

Etiology and effusion characteristics in 29 cats and 60 dogs with pyothorax (2010-2020).

Lynelle R Johnson, Steven E Epstein, Krystle L Reagan

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of veterinary internal medicine. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Retrospective evaluation of dogs presenting with hemothorax.Journal of veterinary internal medicine · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. CT features and short-term outcome in cats presenting with pyothorax.Journal of feline medicine and surgery · 2025
    Article
  5. Fungal Empyema Thoracis Associated withJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Lynelle R JohnsonDepartment of Medicine and Epidemiology, University of California-Davis, Davis, California, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5331-5626
Steven E EpsteinDepartment of Surgical and Radiological Sciences, University of California-Davis, Davis, California, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6126-6695
Krystle L ReaganDepartment of Medicine and Epidemiology, University of California-Davis, Davis, California, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3426-6352
University of California, Davis · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPyothorax, an accumulation of inflammatory fluid in the pleural space, is often caused by foreign body inhalation in dogs, whereas the etiology in cats can be more difficult to discern.

objectiveCompare clinical, microbiologic findings, and etiology in cats and dogs with pyothorax. ANIMALS: Twenty-nine cats and 60 dogs.

methodsMedical records of cats and dogs diagnosed with pyothorax from 2010 to 2020 were reviewed. Clinical findings, fluid analysis, and microbiologic results were retrieved.

resultsAntimicrobials had been administered to equal proportions of cats and dogs before fluid sampling (45% and 47%). Groups did not differ in age or total protein concentration or percentage neutrophils in pleural fluid, but effusion cell count was significantly higher in cats than in dogs (P = .01). Neutrophils containing intracellular bacteria were identified in more cats (27/29, 93%) than dogs (44/60, 73%; P = .05). Penetrating damage to the thorax was implicated as the cause of pyothorax in equal percentages of cats (76%) and dogs (75%). Etiology could not be determined in 2 cats and 1 dog. Cats had higher numbers of bacterial isolates per patient (median, 3) than dogs (median, 1; P = .01) and anaerobes were isolated more often in cats (23/29, 73%) than in dogs (27/60, 45%; P = .003). CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPORTANCE: Pyothorax had similar etiologies in cats and dogs. Cats had higher fluid cell counts, higher numbers of bacterial isolates identified per patient, and intracellular bacteria detected more commonly than did dogs.

Indexed as

Cat DiseasesDog DiseasesEmpyema, PleuralPleural EffusionAnimalsAnti-Bacterial AgentsCatsDogsRetrospective StudiesAnti-Bacterial Agentsculturecytologyempyemamultidrug resistance

Identifiers

PMID37098692
PMCPMC10229369
OpenAlexW4367047789

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.