Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37098616›Full record

ArticlePilot and feasibility studies2023

Implementing digital devices to increase mobility training for people receiving inpatient rehabilitation: protocol for a feasibility hybrid type II randomized controlled trial.

Nisha Aravind, Daniel Treacy, Sakina Chagpar, Lisa A Harvey, Joanne V Glinsky, Catherine Sherrington, Leanne M Hassett

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pilot and feasibility studies, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 37% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Nisha AravindSydney School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia. nara7385@uni.sydney.edu.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6073-9366
Daniel TreacyPhysiotherapy Department, Prince of Wales Hospital, South Eastern Sydney Local Health District, Sydney, Australia.
Sakina ChagparInstitute for Musculoskeletal Health, The University of Sydney/Sydney Local Health District, Sydney, Australia.
Lisa A HarveyJohn Walsh Centre for Rehabilitation Research, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney Northern Clinical School, Sydney, Australia.
Joanne V GlinskyJohn Walsh Centre for Rehabilitation Research, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney Northern Clinical School, Sydney, Australia.
Catherine SherringtonInstitute for Musculoskeletal Health, The University of Sydney/Sydney Local Health District, Sydney, Australia.
Leanne M HassettSydney School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
The University of Sydney · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPeople with mobility limitations can benefit from rehabilitation programs incorporating intensive, repetitive, and task-specific exercises using digital devices such as virtual reality gaming systems, tablet and smartphone applications, and wearable devices. The Activity and MObility UsiNg Technology (AMOUNT) rehabilitation trial (n = 300) showed improvements in mobility in people using these types of digital devices in addition to their usual rehabilitation care when the intervention was provided by an additional study-funded physiotherapist. However, it is not clear if this intervention can be implemented by hospital physiotherapists with a usual clinical load. The AMOUNT Implementation trial aims to explore the feasibility of conducting a large-scale implementation trial.

methodsA pragmatic, assessor blinded, feasibility hybrid type II randomized controlled trial will be undertaken at a public hospital in Australia. There will be two phases. Phase I (Implementation phase) will involve implementing the digital devices into physiotherapy practice. Physiotherapists from the rehabilitation ward will receive a multifaceted implementation strategy guided by the Capabilities, Opportunities, Motivation-Behaviour (COM-B) theoretical model. The implementation strategy includes identifying and training a clinical champion; providing digital devices and education and training; facilitating use of the devices through clinical reasoning sessions and journal clubs; and audit and feedback of exercise dosage documentation. Phase II (Trial phase) will involve randomising 30 eligible inpatients from the same ward into either usual care or usual care plus an additional 30 min or more of exercises using digital devices. This intervention will be provided by the physiotherapists who took part in the implementation phase. We will collect data on feasibility, implementation, and patient-level clinical outcomes. The three primary outcome measures are the extent to which physiotherapists document the dosage of exercises provided to participants (feasibility criteria: exercise practice sheets complete for ≥85% of all participants); ability to recruit participants; and fidelity to the protocol of using digital devices to prescribe exercises (feasibility criteria: average of ≥ 30mins per day for > 50% intervention participants). DISCUSSION: This feasibility study will provide important information to guide the planning and conduct of a future large-scale implementation trial.

trial registrationAustralian and New Zealand Clinical Trial Registry; ACTRN12621000938808; registered 19/07/2021. Trial sponsor: Prince of Wales Hospital. 320-346 Barker Street, Randwick, NSW, 2031, Australia. PROTOCOL VERSION: 6.2 7th April 2021.

Indexed as

FeasibilityImplementationMobilityPhysiotherapyRehabilitationTechnology

Identifiers

PMID37098616
PMCPMC10126551
OpenAlexW4366988505

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.