Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37098539›Full record

ArticleBMC endocrine disorders2023

Predictors of response to ovulation induction using letrozole in women with polycystic ovary syndrome.

Zaixin Guo, Shuwen Chen, Zhiyan Chen, Pan Hu, Yanfang Hao, Qi Yu

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC endocrine disorders, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07448272 (Letrozole 5 mg for 10 Days Compared to Letrozole 10 mg for 5 Days for Ovarian Stimulation in Infertile Women With Polycystic Ovary Syndrome), which is not on this map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07448272 naactive not recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Letrozole 5 mg for 10 Days Compared to Letrozole 10 mg for 5 Days for Ovarian Stimulation in Infertile Women With Polycystic Ovary Syndrome

TypeinterventionalSponsorMst.Sumyara KhatunRan2025 to 2026Enrolled80ConditionsPCOS (Polycystic Ovary Syndrome)ArmsTab letrozole 5mg for 10 days, Tabletrozole 10mg for 5 days
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Zaixin GuoDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, National Clinical Research Center for Obstetric & Gynecologic Diseases, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Peking Union Medical College and Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China.
Shuwen ChenDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, National Clinical Research Center for Obstetric & Gynecologic Diseases, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Peking Union Medical College and Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China.
Zhiyan ChenDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Peking University Shenzhen Hospital, Beijing, China.
Pan HuDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, National Clinical Research Center for Obstetric & Gynecologic Diseases, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Peking Union Medical College and Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China.
Yanfang HaoDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, National Clinical Research Center for Obstetric & Gynecologic Diseases, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Peking Union Medical College and Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China.
Qi YuDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, National Clinical Research Center for Obstetric & Gynecologic Diseases, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Peking Union Medical College and Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China. yuqi2008001@sina.com.
Peking Union Medical College Hospital · CNChinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College · CNPeking University Shenzhen Hospital · CN

Funding

National High Level Hospital Clinical Research Funding 2022-PUMCH-B-081
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis study aimed to evaluate the predictive value of the initial screening characteristics of women with anovulatory polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) who did or did not respond to 2.5 mg letrozole (LET).

methodsThe clinical and laboratory characteristics of women with PCOS who underwent LET treatment were evaluated. Women with PCOS were stratified according to their responses to LET (2.5 mg). The potential predictors of their responses to LET were estimated using logistic regression analysis.

resultsOur retrospective study included 214 eligible patients with a response to 2.5 mg LET (n = 131) or no response to 2.5 mg LET (n = 83). PCOS patients who responded to 2.5 mg LET showed better outcomes than those who did not (2.5 mg LET) for pregnancy rate, live birth rate, pregnancy rate per patient, and live birth rate per patient. Logistic regression analyses showed that late menarche (odds ratio [OR], 1.79 [95% confidence intervals (CI), 1.22-2.64], P = 0.003), and increased anti-müllerian hormone (AMH) (OR, 1.12 [95% CI, 1.02-1.23], P = 0.02), baseline luteinizing hormone (LH)/ follicle stimulating hormone (FSH) (OR, 3.73 [95% CI, 2.12-6.64], P < 0.001), and free androgen index (FAI) (OR, 1.37 [95% CI, 1.16-1.64], P < 0.001) were associated with a higher possibility of no response to 2.5 mg LET.

conclusionsPCOS patients with an increased LH/FSH ratio, AMH, FAI, and late menarche may need an increased dosage of LET for a treatment response, which could be helpful in designing a personalized treatment strategy.

Indexed as

Polycystic Ovary SyndromeFemaleFertility Agents, FemaleFollicle Stimulating HormoneHumansLetrozoleLuteinizing HormoneOvulation InductionPregnancyRetrospective StudiesFertility Agents, FemaleFollicle Stimulating HormoneLetrozoleLuteinizing HormoneLetrozoleOvulationPolycystic ovary syndrome

Identifiers

PMID37098539
PMCPMC10127327
OpenAlexW4366987895

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.