ArticleBMC nursing2023
Development of billing post competency evaluation index system for nurses in China: a Delphi study.
Article in BMC nursing, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- A tiered training program for emergency nurses' core competencies based on Kolb's Experiential Learning Cycle: A Delphi study.BMC nursing · 2026Article
- Constructing A Core Competency Evaluation Index System for Incontinence Specialist Nurses: A Delphi Study.Nursing open · 2026Review
- Development of a Digital Health Literacy Assessment Framework for Older Adults: Delphi-Based Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Article
- Construction of a preventive nursing protocol for eye complications in critically ill patients undergoing prone position ventilation in China: a Delphi study.BMC nursing · 2026Article
- Multidisciplinary Formulation of a Walking Rehabilitation Nursing Protocol for Patients with Lower Extremity Arteriosclerosis Obliterans: A Delphi Study.Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2026Article
- Development and Evaluation of a Nurse Competency Assessment System for Public Health Emergencies.Nursing research and practice · 2026Article
- Barriers to implementation of preoperative urostomy site marking in nurse-physician cooperation: A qualitative study based on the Theoretical Domains Framework.Asia-Pacific journal of oncology nursing · 2025Article
- Construction of competency model for civil aviation flight dispatchers with integrated approach combining grounded theory and structural equation modeling.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Development and validation of an evaluation index system of health education competence for dental nurses in China: a mixed methods study.BMC nursing · 2025Article
- Exploring nursing assistants' competencies in pressure injury prevention and management in nursing homes: a qualitative study using the iceberg model.BMC nursing · 2025Article
- Development of the Competency Evaluation Scale for Clinical Nutritionists in China: A Delphi Study.Nutrients · 2024Article
- Development and validation of a scale for the assessment of the knowledge-attitude-practice of parents towards children snoring.BMC primary care · 2024Review
- Developing a psychological care competences framework for nurses in China: a mixed methods study.BMC nursing · 2024Article
- Common domains of nurses' competencies in public health emergencies: a scoping review.BMC nursing · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimThis study developed a set of competency evaluation indicators for billing nurses in China.
backgroundIn clinical practice, nurses often take up billing responsibilities that are accompanied by certain risks. However, the competency evaluation index system for billing nurses has not been established in China.
methodsThis study consisted of two main phases of research design: the first phase included a literature review and semi-structured interviews. Individual semi-structured interviews were conducted with 12 nurses in billing departments and 15 nurse managers in related departments. Concepts distilled from the literature review were linked to the results of the semi-structured interviews; this phase produced the first draft of indicators for assessing the professional competence of nurses in billing departments. In the second phase, two rounds of correspondence were conducted with 20 Chinese nursing experts using the Delphi method to test and evaluate the content of the index. The consensus was defined in advance as a mean score of 4.0 or above, with at least 75% agreement among participants. In this way, the final indicator framework was determined.
resultsUsing the iceberg model as a theoretical foundation, the literature review identified four main dimensions and associated themes. The semi-structured interviews confirmed all of the themes from the literature review while generating new themes, both of which were incorporated into the first draft of the index. Then two rounds of the Delphi survey were conducted. The positive coefficients of experts in the two rounds were 100% and 95%, respectively, while the authority coefficients were 0.963 and 0.961, respectively. The coefficients of variation were 0.00-0.33 and 0.05-0.24, respectively. The competency evaluation index system for billing nurses consisted of 4 first-level indicators, 16 s-level indicators, and 53 third-level indicators.
conclusionThe competency evaluation index system for billing nurses, which was developed on the basis of the iceberg model, was scientific and applicable. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING MANAGEMENT: The competency assessment index system for billing nurses may provide an effective practical framework for nursing administration to evaluate, train, and assess the competency of billing nurses.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.