Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37098520›Full record

ArticleBMC nursing2023

Development of billing post competency evaluation index system for nurses in China: a Delphi study.

Jiao Liu, Huifang Qiu, Xiaohong Zhang, Cuiling Zhang, Fang He, Pan Yan

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC nursing, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
8.7field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Jiao LiuGeneral Surgery Department, Shanxi Bethune Hospital, Shanxi Academy of Medical Sciences, Tongji Shanxi Hospital, Third Hospital of Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan, 030032, China.
Huifang QiuGeneral Surgery Department, Shanxi Bethune Hospital, Shanxi Academy of Medical Sciences, Tongji Shanxi Hospital, Third Hospital of Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan, 030032, China.
Xiaohong ZhangNursing Department, Shanxi Bethune Hospital, Shanxi Academy of Medical Sciences , Tongji Shanxi Hospital, Third Hospital of Shanxi Medical University, 99 Longcheng street, Taiyuan, 030032, Shanxi province, China. 807595392@qq.com.
Cuiling ZhangDepartment of Digestive Oncology, Shanxi Bethune Hospital, Shanxi Academy of Medical Sciences, Tongji Shanxi Hospital, Third Hospital of Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan, 030032, China.
Fang HeGeneral Surgery Department, Shanxi Bethune Hospital, Shanxi Academy of Medical Sciences, Tongji Shanxi Hospital, Third Hospital of Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan, 030032, China.
Pan YanGeneral Surgery Department, Shanxi Bethune Hospital, Shanxi Academy of Medical Sciences, Tongji Shanxi Hospital, Third Hospital of Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan, 030032, China.
Shanxi Academy of Medical Sciences · CNShanxi Medical University · CNTongji Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimThis study developed a set of competency evaluation indicators for billing nurses in China.

backgroundIn clinical practice, nurses often take up billing responsibilities that are accompanied by certain risks. However, the competency evaluation index system for billing nurses has not been established in China.

methodsThis study consisted of two main phases of research design: the first phase included a literature review and semi-structured interviews. Individual semi-structured interviews were conducted with 12 nurses in billing departments and 15 nurse managers in related departments. Concepts distilled from the literature review were linked to the results of the semi-structured interviews; this phase produced the first draft of indicators for assessing the professional competence of nurses in billing departments. In the second phase, two rounds of correspondence were conducted with 20 Chinese nursing experts using the Delphi method to test and evaluate the content of the index. The consensus was defined in advance as a mean score of 4.0 or above, with at least 75% agreement among participants. In this way, the final indicator framework was determined.

resultsUsing the iceberg model as a theoretical foundation, the literature review identified four main dimensions and associated themes. The semi-structured interviews confirmed all of the themes from the literature review while generating new themes, both of which were incorporated into the first draft of the index. Then two rounds of the Delphi survey were conducted. The positive coefficients of experts in the two rounds were 100% and 95%, respectively, while the authority coefficients were 0.963 and 0.961, respectively. The coefficients of variation were 0.00-0.33 and 0.05-0.24, respectively. The competency evaluation index system for billing nurses consisted of 4 first-level indicators, 16 s-level indicators, and 53 third-level indicators.

conclusionThe competency evaluation index system for billing nurses, which was developed on the basis of the iceberg model, was scientific and applicable. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING MANAGEMENT: The competency assessment index system for billing nurses may provide an effective practical framework for nursing administration to evaluate, train, and assess the competency of billing nurses.

Indexed as

BillingCore competencyDelphi studyIndex systemNursing management

Identifiers

PMID37098520
PMCPMC10127390
OpenAlexW4366989759

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.