Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37098488›Full record

ArticleBMC cancer2023

SNRPD1 conveys prognostic value on breast cancer survival and is required for anthracycline sensitivity.

Xiaofeng Dai, Linhan Cai, Zhifa Zhang, Jitian Li

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC cancer, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 34% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Xiaofeng DaiThe First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an 710061, China. xiaofengteam@163.com.
Linhan CaiWuxi School of Medicine, Jiangnan University, Wuxi, 214122, China.
Zhifa ZhangWuxi School of Medicine, Jiangnan University, Wuxi, 214122, China.
Jitian LiHenan Luoyang Orthopedic Hospital (Henan Provincial Orthopedic Hospital), Henan University of Chinese Medicine, Zhengzhou, 450000, China. jitianlee@hotmail.com.
Jiangnan University · CNLuoyang Orthopedic-Traumatological Hospital of Henan Province · CN

Funding

Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities JUSRP22011National Major Science and Technology Projects of China (CN) 2018ZX10302205-004-002National Natural Science Foundation of China 81972789Technology Development Funding of Wuxi WX18IVJN017
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCancers harboring spliceosome mutations are highly sensitive to additional perturbations on the spliceosome that leads to the development of onco-therapeutics targeting the spliceosome and opens novel opportunities for managing aggressive tumors lacking effective treatment options such as triple negative breast cancers. Being the core spliceosome associated proteins, SNRPD1 and SNRPE have been both proposed as therapeutic targets for breast cancer management. Yet, their differences regarding their prognostic and therapeutic use as well as roles during carcinogenesis are largely unreported.

methodsWe conducted in silico analysis at gene expression and genetic levels to differentiate the clinical relevance of SNRPD1 and SNRPE, and explored their differential functionalities and molecular mechanistic associations with cancer in vitro.

resultsWe showed that high SNRPD1 gene expression was prognostic of poor breast cancer survival whereas SNRPE was not. The SNRPD1 expression quantitative trait loci, rs6733100, was found independently prognostic of breast cancer survival using TCGA data. Silencing either SNRPD1 or SNRPE independently suppressed the growth of breast cancer cells, but decreased migration was only observed in SNRPD1-silenced cells. Knocking down SNRPD1 but not SNRPE triggers doxorubicin resistance in triple negative breast cancer cells. Gene enrichment and network analyses revealed the dynamic regulatory role of SNRPD1 on cell cycle and genome stability, and the preventive role of SNRPE against cancer stemness that may neutralize its promotive role on cancer cell proliferation.

conclusionOur results differentiated the functionalities of SNRPD1 and SNRPE at both prognostic and therapeutic levels, and preliminarily explained the driving mechanism that requires additional explorations and validations.

Indexed as

AnthracyclinesTriple Negative Breast NeoplasmsAntibiotics, AntineoplasticBreastCell Line, TumorGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticHumansPrognosissnRNP Core ProteinsTreatment OutcomeAnthracyclinesAntibiotics, AntineoplasticsnRNP Core ProteinsSNRPD1 protein, humanAnthracycline resistanceClinical outcomePrognostic valueSNRPD1Triple negative breast cancer

Identifiers

PMID37098488
PMCPMC10126993
OpenAlexW4366991253

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.