ArticleBMC cancer2023
SNRPD1 conveys prognostic value on breast cancer survival and is required for anthracycline sensitivity.
Article in BMC cancer, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Single-Cell-Derived Malignant Epithelial Programs Define Prognostic Risk and Therapeutic Vulnerability in Ovarian Cancer.Journal of Cancer · 2026Article
- Clinical significance of SNRPD1 expression in predicting post-transplant recurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma.American journal of translational research · 2026Article
- A Validated Proteomic Signature of Basal-like Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Subtypes Obtained from Publicly Available Data.Cancers · 2025Article
- Chemoproteomics reveals proteome-wide covalent and non-covalent targets of withaferin A.Acta pharmacologica Sinica · 2025Article
- Zearalenone exposure differentially affects the ovarian proteome in pre-pubertal gilts during thermal neutral and heat stress conditions.Journal of animal science · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundCancers harboring spliceosome mutations are highly sensitive to additional perturbations on the spliceosome that leads to the development of onco-therapeutics targeting the spliceosome and opens novel opportunities for managing aggressive tumors lacking effective treatment options such as triple negative breast cancers. Being the core spliceosome associated proteins, SNRPD1 and SNRPE have been both proposed as therapeutic targets for breast cancer management. Yet, their differences regarding their prognostic and therapeutic use as well as roles during carcinogenesis are largely unreported.
methodsWe conducted in silico analysis at gene expression and genetic levels to differentiate the clinical relevance of SNRPD1 and SNRPE, and explored their differential functionalities and molecular mechanistic associations with cancer in vitro.
resultsWe showed that high SNRPD1 gene expression was prognostic of poor breast cancer survival whereas SNRPE was not. The SNRPD1 expression quantitative trait loci, rs6733100, was found independently prognostic of breast cancer survival using TCGA data. Silencing either SNRPD1 or SNRPE independently suppressed the growth of breast cancer cells, but decreased migration was only observed in SNRPD1-silenced cells. Knocking down SNRPD1 but not SNRPE triggers doxorubicin resistance in triple negative breast cancer cells. Gene enrichment and network analyses revealed the dynamic regulatory role of SNRPD1 on cell cycle and genome stability, and the preventive role of SNRPE against cancer stemness that may neutralize its promotive role on cancer cell proliferation.
conclusionOur results differentiated the functionalities of SNRPD1 and SNRPE at both prognostic and therapeutic levels, and preliminarily explained the driving mechanism that requires additional explorations and validations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.