Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37098481›Full record

SynthesisBMC cancer2023

Chemotherapy and targeted therapy for advanced biliary tract cancers: an umbrella review.

Yaoqun Wang, Ningyuan Wen, Shaofeng Wang, Guilin Nie, Yuan Tian, Jiong Lu, Bei Li

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC cancer, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Yaoqun WangDivision of Biliary Surgery, Department of General Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Sichuan, 610041, Chengdu, China.
Ningyuan WenDivision of Biliary Surgery, Department of General Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Sichuan, 610041, Chengdu, China.
Shaofeng WangDivision of Biliary Surgery, Department of General Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Sichuan, 610041, Chengdu, China.
Guilin NieDivision of Biliary Surgery, Department of General Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Sichuan, 610041, Chengdu, China.
Yuan TianDivision of Biliary Surgery, Department of General Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Sichuan, 610041, Chengdu, China.
Jiong LuDivision of Biliary Surgery, Department of General Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Sichuan, 610041, Chengdu, China. libei445@163.com.
Bei LiDivision of Biliary Surgery, Department of General Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Sichuan, 610041, Chengdu, China. nanshengcheng@yeah.net.
Sichuan University · CNWest China Hospital of Sichuan University · CN

Funding

1·3·5 project for disciplines of excellence-Clinical Research Incubation Project, West China Hospital, Sichuan University 20HXFH0211·3·5 project for disciplines of excellence, West China Hospital,Sichuan University ZYJC21049National Natural Science Foundation of China 82002578Science and Technology Support Project of Sichuan Province 2022YSF0060Sichuan Provincial Commission of Health Science Project 20PJ059
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMalignant tumors of the biliary system are characterized by a high degree of malignancy and strong invasiveness, and they are usually diagnosed at late stages with poor prognosis. For patients with advanced biliary tract cancer, chemotherapy and targeted therapy are two of the options available to improve prognosis and delay tumor progression. This study aimed to comprehensively evaluate the safety and effectiveness of various chemotherapy schemes for the treatment of advanced biliary tract cancer in published systematic reviews and meta-analyses (SRoMAs).

methodsAn umbrella review method was adopted, which aims to summarize the existing evidence from multiple studies around a research topic. SRoMAs up to April 9, 2022, were identified using PubMed, Web of Science, the Cochrane database, and manual screening. Eligible studies were screened according to inclusion and exclusion criteria. This study had been registered at PROSPERO (CRD42022324548). For each eligible study, we extracted the data of general characteristics and the main findings. The methodological quality of the included studies were assessed by the AMSTAR2 scale, and the quality of evidence was evaluated by the GRADE tools.

resultsA total of 1833 articles were searched; 14 unique articles with 94 outcomes were identified by eligibility criteria. The incidence of skin rash (RR = 18.11, 95% CI 5.13-63.91, GRADE: Moderate) and diarrhea (RR = 2.48, 95% CI 1.2-5.10, GRADE: Moderate) was higher in patients receiving gemcitabine-based chemotherapy plus targeted therapy than in patients receiving gemcitabine monotherapy. The number of patients receiving gemcitabine-based chemotherapy who developed leukopenia (OR = 7.17, 95% CI 1.43-36.08, GRADE: Moderate), anemia (OR = 7.04, 95% CI 2.59-19.12, GRADE: High), thrombocytopenia (RR = 2.45, 95% CI 1.39-4.32, GRADE: Moderate), and neutropenia (RR = 3.30, 95% CI 1.04-10.50, GRADE: Moderate) was significantly higher than that of patients who received gemcitabine-free regimens. In addition, patients receiving S-1 monotherapy had significantly better ORR (RR = 2.46, 95% CI 1.27-4.57, GRADE: Moderate) than patients receiving S-1 + gemcitabine. Patients receiving fluoropyrimidine-based chemotherapy had longer OS (HR = 0.83, 95% CI 0.7-0.99, GRADE: Moderate), higher DCR (0R = 5.18, 95% CI 3.3-10.23, GRADE: Moderate), and higher ORR (0R = 3.24, 95% CI 1.18-8.92, GRADE: Moderate) compared with patients who received 5-FU/LV monotherapy or supportive therapy. Surprisingly, we found evidence that gemcitabine-based chemotherapy did not improve postoperative patients' OS (HR = 0.91, 95% CI 0.74-1.12, GRADE: Moderate) when compared with best supportive care.

conclusionsThis study comprehensively evaluated the safety and efficacy of chemotherapy or targeted therapy regimens for advanced biliary tract cancer and found 11 outcomes with "Moderate" or "High" levels; however, most of the outcomes were still at "low" or "very low" levels. More randomized controlled studies are needed in the future to further summarize high levels of evidence.

Indexed as

Biliary Tract NeoplasmsThrombocytopeniaAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsGemcitabineHumansGemcitabineBiliary tract cancerChemotherapyGRADETargeted therapyUmbrella review

Identifiers

PMID37098481
PMCPMC10131316
OpenAlexW4367044370

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.