ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2023
Multiple models for outbreak decision support in the face of uncertainty.
Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
21 citing papers in PubMed.
- Adaptive multi-model ensembles for improved epidemic projections and decision support.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2026Article
- A Software Platform for Collaborative Infectious Disease Modeling.Nature health · 2026Article
- A multi-host mechanistic model of African swine fever emergence and control in Romania.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Optimal algorithms for controlling infectious diseases in real time using noisy infection data.PLoS computational biology · 2025Article
- Ensemble approaches for short-term dengue fever forecasts: A global evaluation study.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025Article
- Comparative evaluation of behavioral epidemic models using COVID-19 data.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025Article
- Exploring the influencing factors affecting the operational effectiveness of public health emergency response mechanism: a DEMATEL-ISM-MICMAC mixed methods study.BMC public health · 2025Article
- Understanding Nash epidemics.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025Article
- Asymmetric limits on timely interventions from noisy epidemic data.Communications physics · 2025Article
- Case management of mpox: Where we are and where we desire to be.Journal of public health in Africa · 2025Article
- The utility of infectious disease modelling in informing decisions for outbreak response: A scoping review.PLOS global public health · 2025Article
- Quantum-Like Approaches Unveil the Intrinsic Limits of Predictability in Compartmental Models.Entropy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Projecting the future impact of emerging SARS-CoV-2 variants under uncertainty: Modeling the initial Omicron outbreak.Epidemics · 2024Article
- Agent-based modeling of the COVID-19 pandemic in Florida.Epidemics · 2024Article
- Scenario design for infectious disease projections: Integrating concepts from decision analysis and experimental design.Epidemics · 2024Article
- The US COVID-19 and Influenza Scenario Modeling Hubs: Delivering long-term projections to guide policy.Epidemics · 2024Article
- Evaluation of the US COVID-19 Scenario Modeling Hub for informing pandemic response under uncertainty.Nature communications · 2023Article
- Scenario Design for Infectious Disease Projections: Integrating Concepts from Decision Analysis and Experimental Design.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2023Article
- When the role of uncertainty is…uncertain.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023Article
- Spatial dynamics of malaria transmission.PLoS computational biology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
78 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Policymakers must make management decisions despite incomplete knowledge and conflicting model projections. Little guidance exists for the rapid, representative, and unbiased collection of policy-relevant scientific input from independent modeling teams. Integrating approaches from decision analysis, expert judgment, and model aggregation, we convened multiple modeling teams to evaluate COVID-19 reopening strategies for a mid-sized United States county early in the pandemic. Projections from seventeen distinct models were inconsistent in magnitude but highly consistent in ranking interventions. The 6-mo-ahead aggregate projections were well in line with observed outbreaks in mid-sized US counties. The aggregate results showed that up to half the population could be infected with full workplace reopening, while workplace restrictions reduced median cumulative infections by 82%. Rankings of interventions were consistent across public health objectives, but there was a strong trade-off between public health outcomes and duration of workplace closures, and no win-win intermediate reopening strategies were identified. Between-model variation was high; the aggregate results thus provide valuable risk quantification for decision making. This approach can be applied to the evaluation of management interventions in any setting where models are used to inform decision making. This case study demonstrated the utility of our approach and was one of several multimodel efforts that laid the groundwork for the COVID-19 Scenario Modeling Hub, which has provided multiple rounds of real-time scenario projections for situational awareness and decision making to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention since December 2020.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.