ArticleCureus2023
Risk Factors and Outcome Analysis of Gram-Positive Bacteremia in Critically Ill Patients.
Article in Cureus, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- A single oral dose of an iso-alpha acids rich hop extract dampens the lipoteichoic acid mediated immune response of monocytes in healthy individuals.European journal of nutrition · 2026Trial
- Comparative Effectiveness of Teicoplanin Versus Standard of Care Antibiotics for the Treatment of Gram-Positive Bacteremia: A Seven-Year Retrospective Analysis.Open forum infectious diseases · 2026Article
- Derivation and validation of a new prediction score for bacteremia in the emergency department.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Frequency and Mortality of Adult Meningitis, Pneumonia, or Bacteremia in Colombia from 2015 to 2022: A Retrospective Database Study in a Health Maintenance Organization.Journal of health economics and outcomes research · 2025Article
- Influence of underlying condition and performance of sepsis bundle in very old patients with sepsis: a nationwide cohort study.Annals of intensive care · 2024Article
- Risk Factors and Mortality Outcomes in Elderly Patients With Bloodstream Infections: A Retrospective Analysis.Cureus · 2024Article
- Hospital Acquired Sepsis, Disease Prevalence, and Recent Advances in Sepsis Mitigation.Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction Bloodstream infection (BSI) is a common problem for patients in the intensive care unit (ICU). Nearly 60% of primary bloodstream infections are caused by Gram-positive cocci. Gram-positive bacteria gain access to the bloodstream through invasive procedures and various patient care equipment like catheters, intravenous lines, and mechanical ventilators. S. aureus is considered to be the major cause of septicemia. Knowledge of healthcare-associated infections and the antimicrobial susceptibility patterns of the isolates are crucial in guiding empirical treatment. Methods This prospective observational study was conducted in Medical ICU, Dayanand Medical College & Hospital, Ludhiana over a period of one year (December 2015 to November 2016). Patients whose blood cultures tested positive for Gram-positive bacteria were included in the study. This study was carried out to assess the implications and risk factors for nosocomial BSI and several factors, including the age of the patient, the severity of illness, the presence of catheters, and the microorganisms causing the BSI to independently predict mortality. Chief complaints and risk factors were evaluated. APACHE-II scores were calculated for all patients and outcomes were analyzed. Results In our study, the mean age of patients was 50.93±14.09 years. Central line insertion was found as the most common risk factor (58.7%). A statistically significant correlation was obtained between APACHE-II scores and the presence of risk factors i.e. central line insertion (p-value=0.010) and diabetes mellitus (p-value=0.003). The most common Gram-positive pathogen isolated by blood culture was methicillin-sensitive S. aureus (44.2%). For management, the majority of the patients were prescribed teicoplanin (58.7%). The 28-day overall mortality rate in our study was 52.9%. Conclusion We conclude that independent risk factors like diabetes mellitus, central line insertion, and acute pancreatitis in adult patients with Gram-positive bacteremia were associated with higher mortality. We have also concluded that the administration of early appropriate antibiotics improves patient outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.