Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37097733›Full record

ArticleAdvanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany)2023

Material Stiffness in Cooperation with Macrophage Paracrine Signals Determines the Tenogenic Differentiation of Mesenchymal Stem Cells.

Renwang Sheng, Jia Liu, Wei Zhang, Yifan Luo, Zhixuan Chen, Jiayu Chi, Qingyun Mo, Mingyue Wang, Yuzhi Sun, Chuanquan Liu and 7 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
7.3field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Renwang ShengSchool of Medicine, Southeast University, Nanjing, 210009, P. R. China.
Jia LiuSchool of Medicine, Southeast University, Nanjing, 210009, P. R. China.
Wei ZhangSchool of Medicine, Southeast University, Nanjing, 210009, P. R. China.
Yifan LuoSchool of Medicine, Southeast University, Nanjing, 210009, P. R. China.
Zhixuan ChenSchool of Medicine, Southeast University, Nanjing, 210009, P. R. China.
Jiayu ChiSchool of Medicine, Southeast University, Nanjing, 210009, P. R. China.
Qingyun MoSchool of Medicine, Southeast University, Nanjing, 210009, P. R. China.
Mingyue WangSchool of Medicine, Southeast University, Nanjing, 210009, P. R. China.
Yuzhi SunCenter for Stem Cell and Regenerative Medicine, Southeast University, Nanjing, 210009, P. R. China.
Chuanquan LiuSchool of Medicine, Southeast University, Nanjing, 210009, P. R. China.
Yanan ZhangSchool of Medicine, Southeast University, Nanjing, 210009, P. R. China.
Yue ZhuSchool of Medicine, Southeast University, Nanjing, 210009, P. R. China.
Baian KuangSchool of Medicine, Southeast University, Nanjing, 210009, P. R. China.
Chunguang YanSchool of Medicine, Southeast University, Nanjing, 210009, P. R. China.
Haoyang LiuSchool of Medicine, Southeast University, Nanjing, 210009, P. R. China.
Ludvig J BackmanDepartment of Integrative Medical Biology, Anatomy, Umeå University, Umeå, SE-901 87, Sweden.
Jialin ChenSchool of Medicine, Southeast University, Nanjing, 210009, P. R. China.ORCID 0000-0001-5038-3474
Southeast University · CNRegenerative Medicine Institute · MXUmeå University · SE

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 31900962National Natural Science Foundation of China 81901903Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province BK20190354Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province BK20190356Scientific Research Foundation for Returned Scholars 1124007113
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Stiffness is an important physical property of biomaterials that determines stem cell fate. Guiding stem cell differentiation via stiffness modulation has been considered in tissue engineering. However, the mechanism by which material stiffness regulates stem cell differentiation into the tendon lineage remains controversial. Increasing evidence demonstrates that immune cells interact with implanted biomaterials and regulate stem cell behaviors via paracrine signaling; however, the role of this mechanism in tendon differentiation is not clear. In this study, polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) substrates with different stiffnesses are developed, and the tenogenic differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) exposed to different stiffnesses and macrophage paracrine signals is investigated. The results reveal that lower stiffnesses facilitates tenogenic differentiation of MSCs, while macrophage paracrine signals at these stiffnesses suppress the differentiation. When exposed to these two stimuli, MSCs still exhibit enhanced tendon differentiation, which is further elucidated by global proteomic analysis. Following subcutaneous implantation in rats for 2 weeks, soft biomaterial induces only low inflammation and promotes tendon-like tissue formation. In conclusion, the study demonstrates that soft, rather than stiff, material has a greater potential to guide tenogenic differentiation of stem cells, which provides comprehensive evidence for optimized bioactive scaffold design in tendon tissue engineering.

Indexed as

Mesenchymal Stem CellsParacrine CommunicationAnimalsBiocompatible MaterialsCell DifferentiationProteomicsRatsBiocompatible Materialsmacrophage polarizationproteomicsstem cellstiffnesstenogenic differentiation

Identifiers

PMID37097733
PMCPMC10265049
OpenAlexW4366982891

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.