Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37097468›Full record

SynthesisEuropean archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery2023

Early activation after cochlear implantation: a systematic review.

Afrah Alshalan, Yassin Abdelsamad, Medhat Yousef, Asma Alahmadi, Fida Almuhawas, Abdulrahman Hagr

Abstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Effect of early activation and perimodiolar electrodes on cochlear implant impedance.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2026
    Article
  4. Early activation of active middle ear implants: a prospective study.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Next day cochlear implant switch-on: the New Zealand experience.Journal of the Royal Society of New Zealand · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Afrah AlshalanDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, College of Medicine, Jouf University, PO Box 72418, Skaka, 23235, Saudi Arabia. afrah200951@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0265-6049
Yassin AbdelsamadResearch Department, MED-EL GmbH, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Medhat YousefKing Abdullah Ear Specialist Center (KAESC), College of Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Asma AlahmadiKing Abdullah Ear Specialist Center (KAESC), College of Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Fida AlmuhawasKing Abdullah Ear Specialist Center (KAESC), College of Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Abdulrahman HagrKing Abdullah Ear Specialist Center (KAESC), College of Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo systematically review the outcomes of early activation following cochlear implantation (CI) based on the findings from different studies in the literature.

methodsA comprehensive search strategy was conducted through different databases to identify relevant articles. Our outcomes included impedance levels, rates of complications, hearing and speech perception performance, and patients' satisfaction levels.

resultsThe total number of included studies in this systematic review is 19, which recruited 1157 patients, including 857 who underwent early activation following CI. Seventeen studies investigated impedance levels or feasibility rates of early activation approaches. Most of these studies (n = 10) reported that mean impedance levels remarkably decreased within the first day-to-month (first measurement) post-activation. In addition, all 17 studies showed that impedance levels finally normalize and become comparable with intraoperative levels or the conventional activation group. Seventeen studies reported the occurrence of complications in their population. Ten of these studies indicated that none of their patients developed any post-operative complications after early activation. Seven studies reported the development of some minor complications, including pain 9.2% (28/304), infection 4.7% (13/275), swelling 8.2% (25/304), vertigo 15.1% (8/53), skin hyperemia 2.2% (5/228), and others 16.4% (9/55). Hearing and speech perception was assessed in six studies, which showed a remarkable improvement in their patients. Three studies investigated patients' satisfaction and showed high satisfaction levels. Only one report investigated the economic advantages of early activation.

conclusionEarly activation is safe and feasible and does not impact the hearing and speech outcomes of the patients undergoing CI procedures.

Indexed as

Cochlear ImplantationCochlear ImplantsSpeech PerceptionHumansPatient SatisfactionPostoperative ComplicationsTreatment OutcomeVertigoAudiological outcomeCochlear implantEarly activationHearing lossHearing rehabilitationSpeech outcome

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.