Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37097380›Full record

ArticlePhysical and engineering sciences in medicine2023

Adrenal lesion classification with abdomen caps and the effect of ROI size.

Ahmet Solak, Rahime Ceylan, Mustafa Alper Bozkurt, Hakan Cebeci, Mustafa Koplay

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Physical and engineering sciences in medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ahmet SolakDepartment of Electrical-Electronics Engineering, Konya Technical University, Konya, Turkey. asolak@ktun.edu.tr.
Rahime CeylanDepartment of Electrical-Electronics Engineering, Konya Technical University, Konya, Turkey.
Mustafa Alper BozkurtDepartment of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Selcuk University, Konya, Turkey.
Hakan CebeciDepartment of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Selcuk University, Konya, Turkey.
Mustafa KoplayDepartment of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Selcuk University, Konya, Turkey.
Selçuk University · TRKonya Technical University · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Accurate classification of adrenal lesions on magnetic resonance (MR) images are very important for diagnosis and treatment planning. The detection and classification of lesions in medical imaging heavily rely on several key factors, including the specialist's level of experience, work intensity, and fatigue of the clinician. These factors are critical determinants of the accuracy and effectiveness of the diagnostic process, which in turn has a direct impact on patient health outcomes. With the spread of artificial intelligence, the use of computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) systems in disease diagnosis has also increased. In this study, adrenal lesion classification was performed using deep learning on MR images. The data set used was obtained from the Department of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Selcuk University, and all adrenal lesions were identified and reviewed in consensus by two radiologists experienced with abdominal MR. Studies were carried out on two different data sets created by T1- and T2-weighted MR images. The data set consisted of 112 benign and 10 malignant lesions for each mode. Experiments were performed with regions of interest (ROIs) of different sizes to increase the working performance. Thus, the effect of the selected ROI size on the classification performance was assessed. In addition, instead of the convolutional neural network (CNN) models used in deep learning, a unique classification model structure called Abdomen Caps was proposed. When the data sets used in classification studies are manually separated for training, validation, and testing, different results are obtained with different data sets for each stage. To eliminate this imbalance, tenfold cross-validation was used in this study. The best results obtained were 0.982, 0.999, 0.969, 0.983, 0.998, and 0.964 for accuracy, precision, recall, F1-score, area under the curve (AUC) score, and kappa score, respectively.

Indexed as

Deep LearningRadiologyAbdomenArtificial IntelligenceHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingAdrenal lesionCapsule networkClassificationDeep learning

Identifiers

PMID37097380
OpenAlexW4366988275

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.