Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37097376›Full record

ArticleEuropean radiology experimental2023

Stent appearance in a novel silicon-based photon-counting CT prototype: ex vivo phantom study in head-to-head comparison with conventional energy-integrating CT.

Emma Verelst, Nico Buls, Johan De Mey, Koenraad Hans Nieboer, Frans Vandenbergh, Dominic Crotty, Paul Deak, Albert Sundvall, Staffan Holmin, Aron De Smet and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European radiology experimental, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Emma Verelst *Department of Radiology, Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB), Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel (UZB), Laarbeeklaan 101, 1090, Brussels, Belgium. emma.verelst@vub.be.ORCID 0000-0002-3932-1763
Nico Buls *Department of Radiology, Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB), Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel (UZB), Laarbeeklaan 101, 1090, Brussels, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0003-2830-6899
Johan De MeyDepartment of Radiology, Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB), Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel (UZB), Laarbeeklaan 101, 1090, Brussels, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-3601-3212
Koenraad Hans NieboerDepartment of Radiology, Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB), Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel (UZB), Laarbeeklaan 101, 1090, Brussels, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0001-6530-5014
Frans VandenberghDepartment of Radiology, Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB), Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel (UZB), Laarbeeklaan 101, 1090, Brussels, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-4935-514X
Dominic CrottyGE Healthcare, Waukesha, WI, 53188, USA.
Paul DeakGE Healthcare, Waukesha, WI, 53188, USA.
Albert SundvallDepartment of Medical Radiation Physics and Nuclear Medicine, Karolinska University Hospital, 171 76, Stockholm, Sweden.
Staffan HolminDepartment of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet and Department of Neuroradiology, 171 74, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-1628-1615
Aron De SmetAnatomical Research Training and Education, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, 1090, Brussels, Belgium.
Steven ProvynAnatomical Research Training and Education, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, 1090, Brussels, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-2588-2463
Gert Van GompelDepartment of Radiology, Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB), Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel (UZB), Laarbeeklaan 101, 1090, Brussels, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-9380-7756
Vrije Universiteit Brussel · BEKarolinska Institutet · SEKarolinska University Hospital · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn this study, stent appearance in a novel silicon-based photon-counting computed tomography (Si-PCCT) prototype was compared with a conventional energy-integrating detector CT (EIDCT) system.

methodsAn ex vivo phantom was created, consisting of a 2% agar-water mixture, in which human-resected and stented arteries were individually embedded. Using similar technique parameters, helical scan data was acquired using a novel prototype Si-PCCT and a conventional EIDCT system at a volumetric CT dose index (CTDI

resultsQualitatively, Si-PCCT images were rated higher than EIDCT images at 150-mm FOV, based on stent appearance (p = 0.026) and blooming (p = 0.015), with a moderate inter- (ICC = 0.50) and intra-reader (ICC = 0.60) agreement. Quantitatively, Si-PCCT yielded more accurate diameter measurements (p = 0.001), reduced blooming (p < 0.001) and improved inter-stent distinction (p < 0.001). Similar trends were observed for the images reconstructed at 50-mm FOV.

conclusionsWhen compared to EIDCT, the improved spatial resolution of Si-PCCT yields enhanced stent appearance, more accurate diameter measurements, reduced blooming and improved inter-stent distinction. KEY POINTS: • This study evaluated stent appearance in a novel silicon-based photon-counting computed tomography (Si-PCCT) prototype. • Compared to standard CT, Si-PCCT resulted in more accurate stent diameter measurements. • Si-PCCT also reduced blooming artefacts and improved inter-stent visibility.

Indexed as

PhotonsSiliconHumansPhantoms, ImagingStentsTomography, X-Ray ComputedSiliconPhantoms (imaging)SemiconductorsStentsTomography (x-ray computed)Vascular diseases

Identifiers

PMID37097376
PMCPMC10130245
OpenAlexW4366990962

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.