Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37097330›Full record

ArticleTechniques in coloproctology2023

National implementation of an optimal standardised technique for right-sided colon cancer: protocol of an interventional sequential cohort study (Right study).

Alexander A J Grüter, Usha K Coblijn, Boudewijn R Toorenvliet, Pieter J Tanis, Jurriaan B Tuynman, Right Collaborators Group

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Techniques in coloproctology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04889456 (Implementation of Optimized and Standardized Surgical Technique for Right Sided Colon Cancer), which is not on this map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04889456 nanot yet recruitingnot on this map

Implementation of Optimized and Standardized Surgical Technique for Right Sided Colon Cancer: a Prospective Interventional Sequential Cohort Study With a Transition Period

TypeinterventionalSponsorAmsterdam UMC, location VUmcRan2021 to 2027Enrolled930ConditionsColonic Carcinoma, Laparoscopic Right Hemicolectomy, Standardisation, TrainingArmsImplementation standardised laparoscopic right hemicolectomy with proctoring, Implementation standardised laparoscopic right hemicolectomy without proctoring
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Alexander A J GrüterDepartment of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. a.gruter@amsterdamumc.nl.ORCID 0000-0002-6073-1003
Usha K CoblijnDepartment of Surgery, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Plesmanlaan 121, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-2697-2604
Boudewijn R ToorenvlietDepartment of Surgery, Ikazia Hospital, Montessoriweg 1, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-3615-6889
Pieter J TanisDepartment of Surgery, UMC Location University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-3146-3310
Jurriaan B TuynmanDepartment of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-5952-8000
Right Collaborators Group
Amsterdam University Medical Centers · NLEuropean Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer · NLIkazia Ziekenhuis · NLThe Netherlands Cancer Institute · NLUniversity of Amsterdam · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeMinimally invasive right hemicolectomy (MIRH) is the cornerstone of treatment for patients with right-sided colon cancer. This operation has evolved during recent decades, with many innovations and improvements but this has also resulted in high variability of uptake with subsequent substantial variableness. The aim of this ongoing study is to identify current surgical variations, determine the most optimal and standardised MIRH and nationally train and implement that technique to improve short-term clinical and long-term oncological outcomes.

methodsThe Right study is a national multicentre prospective interventional sequential cohort study. Firstly, current local practice was evaluated. Subsequently, a standardised surgical technique for right-sided colon cancer was determined using the Delphi consensus method, and this procedure was trained during hands-on courses. The standardised MIRH will be implemented with proctoring (implementation cohort), after which the performance will be monitored (consolidation cohort). Patients who will receive a minimally invasive (extended) right hemicolectomy for cT1-3N0-2M0 colon cancer will be included. The primary outcome is patient safety reflected in the 90-day overall complication rate according to the Clavien-Dindo classification. Secondary outcomes will include intraoperative complications, 90-day mortality rate, number of resected tumour-positive lymph nodes, completeness of mesocolic excision, surgical quality score, locoregional and distant recurrence and 5-year overall survival. A total number of 1095 patients (365 per cohort) will be included. DISCUSSION: The Right study is designed to safely implement the best surgical practice concerning patients with right-sided colon cancer aiming to standardise and improve the surgical quality of MIRH at a national level.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04889456, May 2021.

Indexed as

Colonic NeoplasmsLaparoscopyMesocolonCohort StudiesColectomyHumansLymph Node ExcisionProspective StudiesTreatment OutcomeLaparoscopicMinimally invasiveNational implementationRight hemicolectomyRight-sided colon cancerRobot-assisted

Identifiers

PMID37097330
PMCPMC10562307
OpenAlexW4366990991

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.