Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37097325›Full record

ReviewBundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz2023

[Quality measurement in long-term care facilities-the need for a systemic understanding].

Stephanie Krebs, Martina Hasseler

Erratum issuedAbstract readEnglish AbstractReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Stephanie KrebsFakultät Gesundheitswesen, Ostfalia Hochschule für angewandte Wissenschaften, Poststr. 19, 38440, Wolfsburg, Deutschland.
Martina HasselerFakultät Gesundheitswesen, Ostfalia Hochschule für angewandte Wissenschaften, Poststr. 19, 38440, Wolfsburg, Deutschland. m.hasseler@ostfalia.de.
Ostfalia University of Applied Sciences · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In 2019, a new assessment tool for evaluating quality in long-term care facilities was introduced in Germany. The quality indicators are based on a linear understanding of quality, which appears obsolete in view of the many interacting influencing factors (actors, contextual factors). In the international literature, quality assurance in long-term care facilities is rather based on a systemic understanding of quality.This contribution to the discussion is to be classified against the background of the existing debate on quality assessment. Empirical results from two research projects supported by the Innovation Fund, Quality Measurement in Long-Term Care with Routine Data (QMPR) and Cross-Sector & Integrated Emergency and Care Management for the Last Phase of Life in Inpatient Long-Term Care (NOVELLE), are presented to highlight the complexity of quality in long-term care and to also point out the need to develop a systemic understanding of quality in long-term care in Germany. It is necessary to identify the diverse influencing factors in order to develop meaningful and robust quality indicators for long-term care.

Indexed as

Long-Term CareQuality Indicators, Health CareGermanyHumansLong-term careQualityQuality indicatorQuality measurementSystem

Identifiers

PMID37097325
OpenAlexW4366985178

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.