Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37097301›Full record

ArticleExperimental brain research2023

Assessment of vestibulo-ocular reflex and its adaptation during stop-and-go car rides in motion sickness susceptible passengers.

Cecilia Ramaioli, Tobias Steinmetzer, Adrian Brietzke, Paul Meyer, Rebecca Pham Xuan, Erich Schneider, Martin Gorges

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Experimental brain research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Cecilia Ramaioli *Institute of Medical Technology, Brandenburg University of Technology Cottbus-Senftenberg, Cottbus, Germany.
Tobias Steinmetzer *Institute of Medical Technology, Brandenburg University of Technology Cottbus-Senftenberg, Cottbus, Germany.
Adrian BrietzkeErgonomics and Innovation, Chemnitz University of Technology, Chemnitz, Germany.
Paul MeyerFraunhofer Institute for Ceramic Technologies and Systems, Dresden, Germany.
Rebecca Pham XuanGroup Innovation, Volkswagen AG, Wolfsburg, Germany.
Erich SchneiderInstitute of Medical Technology, Brandenburg University of Technology Cottbus-Senftenberg, Cottbus, Germany.
Martin GorgesInstitute of Medical Technology, Brandenburg University of Technology Cottbus-Senftenberg, Cottbus, Germany. martin.gorges@b-tu.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5208-0490
Brandenburg University of Technology Cottbus-Senftenberg · DEVolkswagen Group (Germany) · DEFraunhofer Institute for Ceramic Technologies and Systems · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Motion sickness is a physiological condition that negatively impacts a person's comfort and will be an emerging condition in autonomous vehicles without proper countermeasures. The vestibular system plays a key role in the origin of motion sickness. Understanding the susceptibility and (mal) adaptive mechanisms of the highly integrated vestibular system is a prerequisite for the development of countermeasures. We hypothesize a differential association between motion sickness and vestibular function in healthy individuals with and without susceptibility for motion sickness. We quantified vestibular function by measuring the high-frequency vestibulo-ocular reflex (VOR) using video head impulse testing (vHIT) in 17 healthy volunteers before and after a 11 min motion sickness-inducing naturalistic stop-and-go car ride on a test track (Dekra Test Oval, Klettwitz, Germany). The cohort was classified as motion sickness susceptible (n = 11) and non-susceptible (n = 6). Six (out of 11) susceptible participants developed nausea symptoms, while a total of nine participants were free of these symptoms. The VOR gain (1) did not differ significantly between participant groups with (n = 8) and without motion sickness symptoms (n = 9), (2) did not differ significantly in the factor time before and after the car ride, and showed no interaction between symptom groups and time, as indicated by a repeated measures ANOVA (F(1,15) = 2.19, p = 0.16. Bayesian inference confirmed that there was "anecdotal evidence" for equality of gain rather than difference across groups and time (BF

Indexed as

Motion SicknessReflex, Vestibulo-OcularAutomobilesBayes TheoremDisease SusceptibilityHead Impulse TestHumansAdaptationMotion sicknessStop-and-go car rideVestibulo-ocular reflexVideo head impulse test

Identifiers

PMID37097301
PMCPMC10224860
OpenAlexW4366989736

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.