Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37097070›Full record

SynthesisDeutsches Arzteblatt international2023

Perioperative Arrhythmias.

Simon Pecha, Paulus Kirchhof, Bruno Reissmann

Open access · greenAbstract readMeta-AnalysisReview
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Deutsches Arzteblatt international, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Simon PechaUniversity Heart & Vascular Center Hamburg, Department of Cardiology; Institute of Cardiovascular Sciences, University of Birmingham, UK.
Paulus Kirchhof
Bruno Reissmann
University of Birmingham · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPerioperative arrhythmias are common depending on the type of the operation and can increase morbidity and mortality.

methodsThis review is based on pertinent publications retrieved by a selective search in PubMed, as well as the relevant European guidelines.

resultsArrhythmias are seen in more than 90% of cardiac operations; they are usually transient and often asymptomatic. The risk factors for arrhythmia include ion channel diseases, old age, structural heart disease, cardiac surgery, noncardiac surgery with major fluid shifts, and pulmonary resection. The full spectrum of supraventricular and ventricular arrhythmias can arise perioperatively. Correct ECG interpretation, consideration of the arrhythmia in the overall clinical context, and an understanding of its causes, pathophysiology, and options for effective treatment are critically important. According to a meta-analysis, betablockers lower the risk of perioperative atrial fibrillation (OR = 0.56; 95% confidence interval: [0.35; 0.91]). If anticoagulant treatment is not interrupted for surgery, there is less bleeding with direct oral anticoagulants than with vitamin K antagonists (relative risk: 0.62 [0.47; 0.82]). Moreover, clinical follow-up is important, especially for patients with new-onset atrial fibrillation or heart failure.

conclusionThe identification of high-risk patients and the provision of individualized perioperative monitoring are essential aspects of patient safety. Outpatient cardiological follow-up can improve outcomes.

Indexed as

Atrial FibrillationHeart DiseasesHemorrhageHumans

Identifiers

PMID37097070
PMCPMC10546883
OpenAlexW4366996638

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.