Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37097068›Full record

ReviewDeutsches Arzteblatt international2023

Bacterial Vaginosis-Vaginal Polymicrobial Biofilms and Dysbiosis.

Sonja Swidsinski, Wiltrud Maria Moll, Alexander Swidsinski

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Deutsches Arzteblatt international, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 52 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
52citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
11.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

52 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 63 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. The Gut-Vagina Axis.Microorganisms · 2026
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Regulatory Effects ofMicroorganisms · 2026
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. VaginalFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Inflammatory landscape ofFrontiers in immunology · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sonja SwidsinskiMDI Limbach Berlin GmbH, Berlin, Germany Infactio - Institute for infectiological and microbiological consultation, Bedburg, Germany; Molecular Genetic Laboratory for Polymicrobial Infections und Biofilmse, Gastroenterology, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Germany.
Wiltrud Maria Moll
Alexander Swidsinski
Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBacterial vaginosis (BV) is the most common genital disease worldwide in women of sexually active age, with a prevalence of 23-29%. Its traditional definition as dysbiosis, i.e., a disruption of the normal balance of the vaginal microbiota, with a massive increase of facultative and obligate anaerobic bacteria (mainly Gardnerella spp.) and a loss of lactobacilli, accurately describes the change in the vaginal microbiota, but does not explain the underlying pathophysiology.

methodsThis review is based on information in pertinent articles retrieved by a selective literature search and on the authors' own research findings.

resultsFluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) has revealed Gardnerella spp.-dominated polymicrobial vaginal biofilm as a cause of ascending gynecologic and pregnancy-related infections, preterm birth, and infertility in patients with BV. The biofilm-induced disturbance of epithelial homeostasis favors co-infection with pathogens of sexually transmitted infection (STI). Standard antibiotic therapy is ineffective against biofilms, and there is thus a recurrence rate above 50%. The characteristic biofilm can be followed as a diagnostic marker and is considered evidence of sexual transmission when heterosexual couples and ejaculate samples are examined. FISH studies have shown that, in addition to biofilm-related vaginosis, there are other dysbiotic changes in the vaginal microbiota that have not yet been characterized in detail. It is therefore justified to speak of a "bacterial vaginosis syndrome."

conclusionThe simplistic view of BV as dysbiosis, characterizable by microscopic reference methods, has so far led to inadequate therapeutic success. An evaluation of molecular genetic testing methods that would be suitable for routine use and the development of therapeutic agents that are effective against biofilms are urgently needed if the "bacterial vaginosis syndrome" is to be effectively treated.

Indexed as

Premature BirthVaginosis, BacterialBiofilmsDysbiosisFemaleGardnerellaHumansInfant, NewbornIn Situ Hybridization, FluorescencePregnancy

Identifiers

PMID37097068
PMCPMC10412922
OpenAlexW4366996753

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.