Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37096663›Full record

ArticleeLife2023

The nematode worm

Abraham Katzen, Hui-Kuan Chung, William T Harbaugh, Christina Della Iacono, Nicholas Jackson, Elizabeth E Glater, Charles J Taylor, Stephanie K Yu, Steven W Flavell, Paul W Glimcher and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eLife, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. The Marginal Value Theorem inbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. eLife · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. The dopaminergic system ofRoyal Society open science · 2025
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Understanding the factors regulating host-microbiome interactions usingPhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2024
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. The role of food odor in invertebrate foraging.Genes, brain, and behavior · 2022
    Review
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Abraham KatzenInstitute of Neuroscience, University of Oregon, Eugene, United States.
Hui-Kuan Chung *Center for Neural Science, New York University, New York, United States.
William T Harbaugh *Department of Economics, University of Oregon, Eugene, United States.
Christina Della IaconoInstitute of Neuroscience, University of Oregon, Eugene, United States.
Nicholas JacksonInstitute of Neuroscience, University of Oregon, Eugene, United States.
Elizabeth E GlaterDepartment of Neuroscience, Pomona College, Claremont, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-0205-8209
Charles J TaylorDepartment of Chemistry, Pomona College, Claremont, United States.
Stephanie K YuPicower Institute for Learning and Memory, Department of Brain & Cognitive Sciences, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, United States.
Steven W FlavellPicower Institute for Learning and Memory, Department of Brain & Cognitive Sciences, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-9464-1877
Paul W GlimcherCenter for Neural Science, New York University, New York, United States.
James AndreoniDepartment of Economics, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, United States.
Shawn R LockeryInstitute of Neuroscience, University of Oregon, Eugene, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-8535-7989
University of Oregon · USMassachusetts Institute of Technology · USNew York University · USPomona College · USUniversity of California San Diego · US

Funding

NEURONAL AND THEORETICAL ANALYSIS OF SPATIAL ORIENTATIONR01MH051383 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF OREGON · PI LOCKERY, SHAWN R · 1999 to 2016
$4.7M
Neurogenetic analysis of value-based decision makingR01GM129576 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF OREGON · PI LOCKERY, SHAWN R · 2018 to 2021
$2.1M
OPTIMIZED NETWORKS OF MULTICOMPARTMENTAL NEURONSR29MH051383 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF OREGON · PI LOCKERY, SHAWN R · 1994 to 1998
–
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM129576NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH051383NIMH NIH HHS R29 MH051383
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In value-based decision making, options are selected according to subjective values assigned by the individual to available goods and actions. Despite the importance of this faculty of the mind, the neural mechanisms of value assignments, and how choices are directed by them, remain obscure. To investigate this problem, we used a classic measure of utility maximization, the Generalized Axiom of Revealed Preference, to quantify internal consistency of food preferences in

Indexed as

Caenorhabditis elegansCaenorhabditis elegans ProteinsAnimalsFoodFood PreferencesSignal TransductionCaenorhabditis elegans ProteinsC. eleganschemosensationdecision makingforaging behaviorneuroeconomicsneurosciencesubjective valuetransitivity

Identifiers

PMID37096663
PMCPMC10231927
OpenAlexW4366996798

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.