Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37096588›Full record

ArticleBriefings in bioinformatics2023

Benchmarking of analytical combinations for COVID-19 outcome prediction using single-cell RNA sequencing data.

Yue Cao, Shila Ghazanfar, Pengyi Yang, Jean Yang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Briefings in bioinformatics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Yue CaoSchool of Mathematics and Statistics, The University of Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia.
Shila GhazanfarSchool of Mathematics and Statistics, The University of Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia.
Pengyi YangSchool of Mathematics and Statistics, The University of Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia.
Jean YangSchool of Mathematics and Statistics, The University of Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The advances of single-cell transcriptomic technologies have led to increasing use of single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) data in large-scale patient cohort studies. The resulting high-dimensional data can be summarized and incorporated into patient outcome prediction models in several ways; however, there is a pressing need to understand the impact of analytical decisions on such model quality. In this study, we evaluate the impact of analytical choices on model choices, ensemble learning strategies and integrate approaches on patient outcome prediction using five scRNA-seq COVID-19 datasets. First, we examine the difference in performance between using single-view feature space versus multi-view feature space. Next, we survey multiple learning platforms from classical machine learning to modern deep learning methods. Lastly, we compare different integration approaches when combining datasets is necessary. Through benchmarking such analytical combinations, our study highlights the power of ensemble learning, consistency among different learning methods and robustness to dataset normalization when using multiple datasets as the model input.

Indexed as

BenchmarkingCOVID-19Gene Expression ProfilingHumansMachine LearningSequence Analysis, RNAbenchmarkCOVID-19disease outcome predictionpatient analysissingle-cell

Identifiers

PMID37096588
PMCPMC10199760

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.