Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37096575›Full record

GuidelineThe Journal of urology2023

Early Detection of Prostate Cancer: AUA/SUO Guideline Part II: Considerations for a Prostate Biopsy.

John T Wei, Daniel Barocas, Sigrid Carlsson, Fergus Coakley, Scott Eggener, Ruth Etzioni, Samson W Fine, Misop Han, Sennett K Kim, Erin Kirkby and 9 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · greenAbstract readPractice Guideline
In one paragraph

Guideline in The Journal of urology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06360523 (ProstateAI - A Prospective Paired Validating Cohort Study to Evaluate an MRI-based Optimized Prostate Cancer Diagnostic Pathway Powered by Artificial Intelligence), which is not on this map. Cited by 114 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
114citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
38.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06360523 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

ProstateAI - A Prospective Paired Validating Cohort Study to Evaluate an MRI-based Optimized Prostate Cancer Diagnostic Pathway Powered by Artificial Intelligence

TypeinterventionalSponsorChinese University of Hong KongRan2024 to 2028Enrolled368ConditionsProstate CancerArmsAI modal, Standard review
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

114 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 149 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Efficacy of [Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Successes and challenges in developing a magnetic resonance imaging-transrectal ultrasound machine fusion prostate biopsy service.Canadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada · 2026
    Review
  14. Review
  15. From Test Accuracy to Clinical Risk Interpretation: A Bayesian Perspective on Pre-Biopsy Biomarkers.International journal of urology : official journal of the Japanese Urological Association · 2026
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article

54 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors at 14 institutions in 2 countries.

John T WeiUniversity of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Daniel BarocasVanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee.
Sigrid CarlssonMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Fergus CoakleyOregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon.
Scott EggenerUniversity of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois.
Ruth EtzioniFred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, Washington.
Samson W FineMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Misop HanJohns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland.
Sennett K KimAmerican Urological Association, Linthicum, Maryland.
Erin KirkbyAmerican Urological Association, Linthicum, Maryland.
Badrinath R KonetyAllina Health, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
Martin MinerBrown University, Providence, Rhode Island.
Kelvin MosesVanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee.
Merel G NissenbergNational Alliance of State Prostate Cancer Coalitions, Los Angeles, California.
Peter A PintoNational Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland.
Simpa S SalamiUniversity of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Lesley SouterNomadic EBM Methodology, Smithville, Ontario, Canada.
Ian M ThompsonCHRISTUS Health, San Antonio, Texas.
Daniel W LinUniversity of Washington, Seattle, Washington.
American Urological Association · USMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center · USUniversity of Michigan–Ann Arbor · USVanderbilt University · USAllina Health · USChristus Health · USFred Hutch Cancer Center · USJohn Brown University · USJohns Hopkins University · USNational Alliance of State Prostate Cancer CoalitionsNational Institutes of Health · USOregon Health & Science University · USUniversity of Chicago · USUniversity of Washington · US

Funding

Modeling Precision Interventions for Prostate Cancer ControlU01CA253915 · NCI · FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER · PI ETZIONI, RUTH D, TSODIKOV, ALEXANDER · 2020 to 2025
$6.5M
Michigan-VUMC Biomarker Characterization CenterU2CCA271854 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI ARUL M CHINNAIYAN · 2022 to 2026
$5.4M
NCI NIH HHS U01 CA253915NCI NIH HHS U2C CA271854
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe summary presented herein covers recommendations on the early detection of prostate cancer and provides a framework to facilitate clinical decision-making in the implementation of prostate cancer screening, biopsy, and follow-up. This is Part II of a two-part series focusing on initial and repeat biopsies, and biopsy technique. Please refer to Part I for discussion of initial prostate cancer screening recommendations. MATERIALS AND

methodsThe systematic review utilized to inform this guideline was conducted by an independent methodological consultant. The systematic review was based on searches in Ovid MEDLINE and Embase and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (January 1, 2000-November 21, 2022). Searches were supplemented by reviewing reference lists of relevant articles.

resultsThe Early Detection of Prostate Cancer Panel developed evidence- and consensus-based guideline statements to provide guidance in prostate cancer screening, initial and repeat biopsies, and biopsy technique.

conclusionsThe evaluation of prostate cancer risk should be focused on the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer (Grade Group 2 or higher [GG2+]). The use of laboratory biomarkers, prostate MRI, and biopsy techniques described herein may improve detection and safety when a prostate biopsy is deemed necessary following prostate cancer screening.

Indexed as

Prostatic NeoplasmsBiopsyEarly Detection of CancerHumansImage-Guided BiopsyMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleProstateProstate-Specific AntigenSystematic Reviews as TopicProstate-Specific AntigenAIPASAPbiomarkersbiopsy techniqueearly detection of prostate cancerHGPINimagingMRIPI-RADSprostate cancer biopsyprostate cancer screeningPSAtransperinealtransrectal

Identifiers

PMID37096575
PMCPMC11321723
OpenAlexW4366987732

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.