Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37096305›Full record

ArticleJournal of applied clinical medical physics2023

Methodology for computed tomography characterization of commercially available 3D printing materials for use in radiology/radiation oncology.

Madison Kozee, Joseph Weygand, Jacqueline M Andreozzi, Dylan Hunt, Bradford A Perez, Jasmine A Graham, Gage Redler

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of applied clinical medical physics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Madison KozeeDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida, USA.
Joseph WeygandDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida, USA.
Jacqueline M AndreozziDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida, USA.
Dylan HuntDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida, USA.
Bradford A PerezDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida, USA.
Jasmine A GrahamDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida, USA.
Gage RedlerDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8755-9218

Funding

VIRAL ONCOLOGY CORE FACILITYP30CA014599 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI CHIEN-MIN KAO · 1985 to 2026
$122.1M
Finding Synergy with Radiation Therapy and Immunotherapy for Patients with Lung CancerK08CA231454 · NCI · H. LEE MOFFITT CANCER CTR & RES INST · PI PEREZ, BRADFORD A. · 2019 to 2023
$1.2M
NCI NIH HHS K08 CA231454NIH HHS P30 CA14599
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

3D printing in medical physics provides opportunities for creating patient-specific treatment devices and in-house fabrication of imaging/dosimetry phantoms. This study characterizes several commercial fused deposition 3D printing materials with some containing nonstandard compositions. It is important to explore their similarities to human tissues and other materials encountered in patients. Uniform cylinders with infill from 50 to 100% at six evenly distributed intervals were printed using 13 different filaments. A novel approach rotating infill angle 10

Indexed as

Radiation OncologyHumansPhantoms, ImagingPrinting, Three-DimensionalRadiographyRadiometryTomography, X-Ray Computed3D printingadditive manufacturingmaterial characterizationphantom

Identifiers

PMID37096305
PMCPMC10243336

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.