ArticleBioMed research international2023
Comparison of
Article in BioMed research international, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Dual-Function Antimicrobial Peptides as a Prospective Strategy Against Peri-Implantitis: Bridging Cutaneous Wound Healing and the Peri-Implant Soft-Tissue Seal.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Review
- Fatigue Survival and Biomechanical Behavior of Two-piece Titanium and Zirconia Dental Implants.Journal of clinical and experimental dentistry · 2026Review
- Microporous zirconium-coated titanium surfaces for dental implant application: Surface characterization, bioactivity and effect on the oral biofilm formation.Journal of materials science. Materials in medicine · 2025Article
- Zirconia in Dental Implantology: A Review of the Literature with Recent Updates.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Effect of implant abutment surface treatments on bacterial biofilm composition and structure.Journal of oral microbiology · 2025Article
- Zirconia Dental Implant Designs and Surface Modifications: A Narrative Review.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Microbiological and Imaging-Based Evaluations of Photodynamic Therapy Combined with Er:YAG Laser Therapy in the In Vitro Decontamination of Titanium and Zirconia Surfaces.Microorganisms · 2024Article
- Comparison of the Intensity of Biofilm Production by Oral Microflora and Its Adhesion on the Surface of Zirconia Produced in Additive and Subtractive Technology: An In Vitro Study.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Dental Implants: Modern Materials and Methods of Their Surface Modification.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Influence of Dental Titanium Implants with Different Surface Treatments Using Femtosecond and Nanosecond Lasers on Biofilm Formation.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Peri-implant diseases are emerging issues in contemporary implant dentistry. As biofilms play a critical role in peri-implant diseases, the characteristic of resisting bacterial adhesion would be ideal for dental implants. The aims of the study were to compare titanium (Ti) and zirconia (Zr) implants regarding the amount of biofilm formation at different time frames and assess the distribution of biofilm on different aspects of dental implants. Methods: Biofilm was developed on Ti and Zr dental implants with a peri-implant-related multispecies model with Results: Three-day-old biofilm on Ti implants was significantly higher than that on Zr implants ( Conclusion: While early formed biofilms show greater accumulation on Ti implants compared to Zr implants, older biofilms between the two groups are comparable. The distribution of biofilms was not uniform on different areas of implant threads during early biofilm development.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.