ArticleJAMIA open2023
Weakly supervised spatial relation extraction from radiology reports.
Article in JAMIA open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Information Extraction from Lumbar Spine MRI Radiology Reports Using GPT4: Accuracy and Benchmarking Against Research-Grade Comprehensive Scoring.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Leveraging large language models for knowledge-free weak supervision in clinical natural language processing.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- A scoping review of large language model based approaches for information extraction from radiology reports.NPJ digital medicine · 2024Article
- Year 2023 in Biomedical Natural Language Processing: a Tribute to Large Language Models and Generative AI.Yearbook of medical informatics · 2024Article
- Leveraging Large Language Models for Knowledge-free Weak Supervision in Clinical Natural Language Processing.Research square · 2024Article
- Scalable Approach to Consumer Wearable Postmarket Surveillance: Development and Validation Study.JMIR medical informatics · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Weak supervision holds significant promise to improve clinical natural language processing by leveraging domain resources and expertise instead of large manually annotated datasets alone. Here, our objective is to evaluate a weak supervision approach to extract spatial information from radiology reports. Materials and Methods: Our weak supervision approach is based on data programming that uses rules (or labeling functions) relying on domain-specific dictionaries and radiology language characteristics to generate weak labels. The labels correspond to different spatial relations that are critical to understanding radiology reports. These weak labels are then used to fine-tune a pretrained Bidirectional Encoder Representations from Transformers (BERT) model. Results: Our weakly supervised BERT model provided satisfactory results in extracting spatial relations without manual annotations for training (spatial trigger F1: 72.89, relation F1: 52.47). When this model is further fine-tuned on manual annotations (relation F1: 68.76), performance surpasses the fully supervised state-of-the-art. Discussion: To our knowledge, this is the first work to automatically create detailed weak labels corresponding to radiological information of clinical significance. Our data programming approach is (1) adaptable as the labeling functions can be updated with relatively little manual effort to incorporate more variations in radiology language reporting formats and (2) generalizable as these functions can be applied across multiple radiology subdomains in most cases. Conclusions: We demonstrate a weakly supervision model performs sufficiently well in identifying a variety of relations from radiology text without manual annotations, while exceeding state-of-the-art results when annotated data are available.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.