Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37096148›Full record

ArticleJAMIA open2023

Weakly supervised spatial relation extraction from radiology reports.

Surabhi Datta, Kirk Roberts

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMIA open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Surabhi DattaSchool of Biomedical Informatics, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, Texas, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5634-2005
Kirk RobertsSchool of Biomedical Informatics, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, Texas, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6525-5213

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: Weak supervision holds significant promise to improve clinical natural language processing by leveraging domain resources and expertise instead of large manually annotated datasets alone. Here, our objective is to evaluate a weak supervision approach to extract spatial information from radiology reports. Materials and Methods: Our weak supervision approach is based on data programming that uses rules (or labeling functions) relying on domain-specific dictionaries and radiology language characteristics to generate weak labels. The labels correspond to different spatial relations that are critical to understanding radiology reports. These weak labels are then used to fine-tune a pretrained Bidirectional Encoder Representations from Transformers (BERT) model. Results: Our weakly supervised BERT model provided satisfactory results in extracting spatial relations without manual annotations for training (spatial trigger F1: 72.89, relation F1: 52.47). When this model is further fine-tuned on manual annotations (relation F1: 68.76), performance surpasses the fully supervised state-of-the-art. Discussion: To our knowledge, this is the first work to automatically create detailed weak labels corresponding to radiological information of clinical significance. Our data programming approach is (1) adaptable as the labeling functions can be updated with relatively little manual effort to incorporate more variations in radiology language reporting formats and (2) generalizable as these functions can be applied across multiple radiology subdomains in most cases. Conclusions: We demonstrate a weakly supervision model performs sufficiently well in identifying a variety of relations from radiology text without manual annotations, while exceeding state-of-the-art results when annotated data are available.

Indexed as

data programminginformation extractionnatural language processingradiology reportrelation extractionweak supervision

Identifiers

PMID37096148
PMCPMC10122604

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.