Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37096121›Full record

ArticleBioinformatics advances2023

Identification of a gene expression signature associated with breast cancer survival and risk that improves clinical genomic platforms.

Santiago Bueno-Fortes, Alberto Berral-Gonzalez, José Manuel Sánchez-Santos, Manuel Martin-Merino, Javier De Las Rivas

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformatics advances, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Whole-Genome Doubling as a source of cancer: how, when, where, and why?Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Santiago Bueno-FortesCancer Research Center (CiC-IMBCC, CSIC/USAL and IBSAL), Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC) and University of Salamanca (USAL), Salamanca 37007, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7141-2860
Alberto Berral-GonzalezCancer Research Center (CiC-IMBCC, CSIC/USAL and IBSAL), Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC) and University of Salamanca (USAL), Salamanca 37007, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8388-6051
José Manuel Sánchez-SantosDepartment of Statistics, University of Salamanca (USAL), Salamanca 37008, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7434-7598
Manuel Martin-MerinoDepartment of Computer Science, Universidad Pontificia de Salamanca (UPSA), Salamanca 37002, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5914-2332
Javier De Las RivasCancer Research Center (CiC-IMBCC, CSIC/USAL and IBSAL), Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC) and University of Salamanca (USAL), Salamanca 37007, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0984-9946
Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas · ESUniversidad de Salamanca · ESUniversidad Pontificia de Salamanca · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Motivation: Modern genomic technologies allow us to perform genome-wide analysis to find gene markers associated with the risk and survival in cancer patients. Accurate risk prediction and patient stratification based on robust gene signatures is a key path forward in personalized treatment and precision medicine. Several authors have proposed the identification of gene signatures to assign risk in patients with breast cancer (BRCA), and some of these signatures have been implemented within commercial platforms in the clinic, such as Oncotype and Prosigna. However, these platforms are black boxes in which the influence of selected genes as survival markers is unclear and where the risk scores provided cannot be clearly related to the standard clinicopathological tumor markers obtained by immunohistochemistry (IHC), which guide clinical and therapeutic decisions in breast cancer. Results: Here, we present a framework to discover a robust list of gene expression markers associated with survival that can be biologically interpreted in terms of the three main biomolecular factors (IHC clinical markers: ER, PR and HER2) that define clinical outcome in BRCA. To test and ensure the reproducibility of the results, we compiled and analyzed two independent datasets with a large number of tumor samples (1024 and 879) that include full genome-wide expression profiles and survival data. Using these two cohorts, we obtained a robust subset of gene survival markers that correlate well with the major IHC clinical markers used in breast cancer. The geneset of survival markers that we identify (which includes 34 genes) significantly improves the risk prediction provided by the genesets included in the commercial platforms: Oncotype (16 genes) and Prosigna (50 genes, i.e. PAM50). Furthermore, some of the genes identified have recently been proposed in the literature as new prognostic markers and may deserve more attention in current clinical trials to improve breast cancer risk prediction. Availability and implementation: All data integrated and analyzed in this research will be available on GitHub (https://github.com/jdelasrivas-lab/breastcancersurvsign), including the R scripts and protocols used for the analyses. Supplementary information: Supplementary data are available at

Identifiers

PMID37096121
PMCPMC10122606
OpenAlexW4330334927

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.