ArticleHeliyon2023
Clinical feasibility and validation of the accelerated T2 mapping sequence GRAPPATINI in brain imaging.
Article in Heliyon, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Synthetic T2-weighted images and T2 quantification using GRAPPATINI for shoulder joint evaluation: comparison with conventional T2-weighted images.Skeletal radiology · 2026Article
- Healthy knee cartilage T2 mapping assessed with GRAPPATINI and multi-echo spin-echo (MESE) at 3T: regional values, longitudinal repeatability and method agreement.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2026Article
- Value of MRI - T2 Mapping to Differentiate Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer.Journal of imaging informatics in medicine · 2024Article
- Ultrafast Brain MRI at 3 T for MS: Evaluation of a 51-Second Deep Learning-Enhanced T2-EPI-FLAIR Sequence.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Rationale and objectives: To prospectively evaluate feasibility and robustness of an accelerated T2 mapping sequence (GRAPPATINI) in brain imaging and to assess its synthetic T2-weighted images (sT2w) in comparison with a standard T2-weighted sequence (T2 TSE). Material and methods: Volunteers were included to evaluate the robustness and consecutive patients for morphological evaluation. They were scanned on a 3 T MR-scanner. Healthy volunteers underwent GRAPPATINI of the brain three times (day 1: scan/rescan; day 2: follow-up). Patients between the ages of 18 and 85 years who were able to provide written informed consent and who had no MRI contraindications were included. For morphological comparison two radiologists with 5 and 7 years of experience in brain MRI evaluated image quality using a Likert scale (1 being poor, 4 being excellent) in a blinded and randomized fashion. Results: Images were successfully acquired in ten volunteers with a mean age of 25 years (ranging from 22 to 31 years) and 52 patients (23 men/29 women) with a mean age of 55 years (range of 22-83 years). Most brain regions showed repeatable and reproducible T2 values (rescan: CoV 0.75%-2.06%, ICC 69%-92.3%; follow-up: CoV 0.41%-1.59%, ICC 79.4%-95.8%), except for the caudate nucleus (rescan: CoV 7.25%, ICC 66.3%; follow-up: CoV 4.78%, ICC 80.9%). Image quality of sT2w was rated inferior to T2 TSE (median for T2 TSE: 3; sT2w: 1-2), but measurements revealed good interrater reliability of sT2w (lesion counting: ICC 0.85; diameter measure: ICC 0.68 and 0.67). Conclusion: GRAPPATINI is a feasible and robust T2 mapping sequence of the brain on intra- and intersubject level. The resulting sT2w depict brain lesions comparable to T2 TSE despite its inferior image quality.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.