ReviewHeliyon2023
Role of advanced cardiovascular imaging in chemotherapy-induced cardiotoxicity.
Review in Heliyon, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Application of Artificial Intelligence in Cardio-Oncology Imaging for Cancer Therapy-Related Cardiovascular Toxicity: Systematic Review.JMIR cancer · 2025Pooled it
- Clinical applications of PET imaging for evaluating treatment-induced vascular toxicity in oncology.Current opinion in hematology · 2026Review
- Myocardial extracellular volume fraction in cardiac CT: comparison of deep learning reconstruction and iterative reconstruction.Journal of thoracic disease · 2026Article
- Cancer treatment-related cardiotoxicity, molecular mechanism, challenges, and research trends.Discover oncology · 2026Review
- Precision Monitoring Strategies for Chemotherapy-Induced Cardiotoxicity: A Review of Molecular Indicators for Early Detection and Risk Stratification.Reviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Review
- Late gadolinium enhancement CMR for detecting myocardial injury after cancer therapy: a real-world observational study.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Article
- CPX-351 vs. conventional chemotherapy cardiotoxicity in high-risk AML: a post hoc phase III trial analysis.Cardio-oncology (London, England) · 2025Article
- Review
- Effect of cyclophospamide, doxorubicin, vincristine and prednisone/prednisolone (CHOP) chemotherapy regimens on left ventricular systolic function and cardiac structural abnormalities in non-Hodgkin lymphoma patients.Journal of the Egyptian National Cancer Institute · 2025Article
- Review
- Assessment of myocardial deformation by CMR tissue tracking reveals left ventricular subclinical myocardial dysfunction in patients with gynecologic cancer undergoing chemotherapy.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
- Realistic Aspects of Cardiac Ultrasound in Rats: Practical Tips for Improved Examination.Journal of imaging · 2024Review
- Chemotherapy Related Cardiotoxicity Evaluation-A Contemporary Review with a Focus on Cardiac Imaging.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Review
- Applied Cardio-Oncology in Hematological Malignancies: A Narrative Review.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Myocardial extracellular volume derived from contrast-enhanced chest computed tomography in longitudinal evaluation of cardiac toxicity in patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2024Article
- Anthracycline's Effects on Heart Rate Variability in Children with Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia: Early Toxicity Signs-Pilot Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The development of cardiotoxicity induced by cancer treatments has emerged as a significant clinical problem, both in the short run, as it may influence drug administration in chemotherapeutic protocols, and in the long run, because it may determine adverse cardiovascular outcomes in survivors of various malignant diseases. Therefore, early detection of anticancer drug-related cardiotoxicity is an important clinical target to improve prevention of adverse effects and patient care. Today, echocardiography is the first-line cardiac imaging techniques used for identifying cardiotoxicity. Cardiac dysfunction, clinical and subclinical, is generally diagnosed by the reduction of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and global longitudinal strain (GLS). However, myocardial injury detected by echocardiography is preceded by other alterations, such as myocardial perfusion and mitochondrial and metabolic dysfunction, that can only be recognized by second-level imaging techniques, like cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) and nuclear imaging, which, using targeted radiotracers, may help to provide information on the specific mechanisms of cardiotoxicity. In this review, we focus on the current and emerging role of CMR, as a critical diagnostic tool of cardiotoxicity in the very early phase, due to its availability and because it allows the contemporary detection of functional alterations, tissue alterations (mainly performed using T1, T2 mapping with the evaluation of extracellular volume-ECV) and perfusional alteration (evaluated with rest-stress perfusion) and, in the next future, even metabolic changes. Moreover, in the subsequent future, the use of Artificial Intelligence and big data on imaging parameters (CT, CMR) and oncoming molecular imaging datasets, including differences for gender and countries, may help predict cardiovascular toxicity at its earliest stages, avoiding its progression, with precise tailoring of patients' diagnostic and therapeutic pathways.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.