ArticleHeliyon2023
Deep learning-powered 3D segmentation derives factors associated with lymphovascular invasion and prognosis in clinical T1 stage non-small cell lung cancer.
Article in Heliyon, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- CT-based Intratumoral Heterogeneity Score for Preoperative Prediction of Lymphovascular Invasion and Prognosis in Lung Adenocarcinoma: A Multicenter Validation and Radiogenomic Interpretation.Annals of surgical oncology · 2026Article
- The impact of chest computed tomography-defined emphysema on extrapulmonary metastases in patients with lung cancer.BMC medical imaging · 2026Article
- Construction and verification of a nomogram to predict the probability of venous thromboembolism in lung cancer patients.Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2026Article
- Multimodality approach for locally advanced lung cancer: when is surgery most beneficial?Journal of cardiothoracic surgery · 2025Article
- Article
- A Thorough Review of the Clinical Applications of Artificial Intelligence in Lung Cancer.Cancers · 2025Review
- Stacking Model-Based Preoperative Prediction of Lymphovascular Invasion in Lung Adenocarcinoma by Integrating Intratumoral Heterogeneity Score and Clinicoradiological Features: A Multicenter Study.Technology in cancer research & treatmentArticle
- Robustness and Accuracy of Radiomics Models for Classifying IASLC Grading in Lung Adenocarcinomas: A Comprehensive Analysis of a Large Multicenter CT Database.Technology in cancer research & treatmentArticle
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Lymphovascular invasion (LVI) is an invasive biologic behavior that affects the treatment and prognosis of patients with early-stage lung cancer. This study aimed to identify LVI diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers using deep learning-powered 3D segmentation with artificial intelligence (AI) technology. Methods: Between January 2016 and October 2021, we enrolled patients with clinical T1 stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We used commercially available AI software (Dr. Wise system, Deep-wise Corporation, China) to extract quantitative AI features of pulmonary nodules automatically. Dimensionality reduction was achieved through least absolute shrinkage and selection operator regression; subsequently, the AI score was calculated.Then, the univariate and multivariate analysis was further performed on the AI score and patient baseline parameters. Results: Among 175 enrolled patients, 22 tested positive for LVI at pathology review. Based on the multivariate logistic regression results, we incorporated the AI score, carcinoembryonic antigen, spiculation, and pleural indentation into the nomogram for predicting LVI. The nomogram showed good discrimination (C-index = 0.915 [95% confidence interval: 0.89-0.94]); moreover, calibration of the nomogram revealed good predictive ability (Brier score = 0.072). Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed that relapse-free survival and overall survival were significantly higher among patients with a low-risk AI score and without LVI than those among patients with a high-risk AI score (p = 0.008 and p = 0.002, respectively) and with LVI (p = 0.013 and p = 0.008, respectively). Conclusions: Our findings indicate that a high-risk AI score is a diagnostic biomarker for LVI in patients with clinical T1 stage NSCLC; accordingly, it can serve as a prognostic biomarker for these patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.