ArticleHeliyon2023
Recovery time from VR sickness due to susceptibility: Objective and quantitative evaluation using electroencephalography.
Article in Heliyon, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.
- A Study on Autonomous Driving Motion Sickness from the Perspective of Multimodal Human Signals.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- A preliminary comparison of bellringer performance across three visual modalities for the assessment of anatomy knowledge.Anatomical sciences education · 2026Article
- The Impact of Virtual Reality Immersion on Learning Outcomes: A Comparative Study of Declarative and Procedural Knowledge Acquisition.Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Electroencephalography Changes During Cybersickness: Focusing on Delta and Alpha Waves.Brain topography · 2025Article
- Assessing the feasibility of the Virtual Reality Education and Acceptance Protocol among baseball and softball players.PloS one · 2025Article
- Article
- Article
- Cybersickness in People with Multiple Sclerosis Exposed to Immersive Virtual Reality.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
With the increasing use of virtual reality (VR) devices, interest in reducing their negative effects, such as VR sickness, is also increasing. This study used electroencephalography (EEG) to investigate participants' VR sickness recovery time after watching a VR video. We tested 40 participants in advance using a motion sickness susceptibility questionnaire (MSSQ). We classified the participants into two groups (sensitive group/non-sensitive group) depending on their MSSQ scores. We used a simulator sickness questionnaire (SSQ) and EEG to evaluate VR sickness. The SSQ score increased significantly after watching the VR sickness-inducing video (VR video) in both groups (p < 0.001). The recovery time based on the SSQ was 11.3 ± 6.6 min for the sensitive group and 9.1 ± 5.2 min for the non-sensitive group. The difference in recovery time between the two groups was not significant (p > 0.05). EEG results showed that recovery time took an average of 11.5 ± 7.1 min in both groups. The EEG data showed that the delta wave increased significantly across all brain areas (p < 0.01). There was no statistical difference between groups in recovering VR sickness depending on individual characteristics. However, we confirmed that subjective and objective VR recovery required at least 11.5 min. This finding can inform recommendations regarding the VR sickness recovery times.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.