Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37095952›Full record

ArticleHeliyon2023

Abattoir residues as nutrient resources: Nitrogen recycling with bone chars and biogas digestates.

Gerhard Soja, Anders Sörensen, Bernhard Drosg, Wolfgang Gabauer, Markus Ortner, Alexander Schumergruber, Gerald Dunst, Daniela Meitner, Elena Guillen-Burrieza, Christoph Pfeifer

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Heliyon, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Gerhard SojaUniversity of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Vienna, Institute for Chemical and Energy Engineering, 1190, Wien, Austria.
Anders SörensenUniversity of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Vienna, Institute for Chemical and Energy Engineering, 1190, Wien, Austria.
Bernhard DrosgBEST Bioenergy and Sustainable Technologies, 3430, Tulln, Austria.
Wolfgang GabauerUniversity of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Vienna, Institute of Environmental Biotechnology, 3430, Tulln, Austria.
Markus OrtnerBEST Bioenergy and Sustainable Technologies, 3430, Tulln, Austria.
Alexander SchumergruberRudolf Großfurtner GmbH, 4972, Utzenaich, Austria.
Gerald DunstSonnenerde GmbH, 7422, Riedlingsdorf, Austria.
Daniela MeitnerNext Generation Elements GmbH, 4101, Feldkirchen, Austria.
Elena Guillen-BurriezaAEE-INTEC, 8200, Gleisdorf, Austria.
Christoph PfeiferUniversity of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Vienna, Institute for Chemical and Energy Engineering, 1190, Wien, Austria.
BOKU University · ATBEST - Bioenergy and Sustainable Technologies (Austria) · ATAEE Institute for Sustainable Technologies · ATAustrian Institute of Technology · AT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Abattoirs produce by-products that may become valuable resources for nutrient recycling and energy generation by including pyrolysis and biogas production in the value creation chain. This study investigated the potential of bone chars as sorbents for ammonium in order to produce a soil amendment useful for fertilizing purposes. Ammonium enriched from the digestate by membrane distillation or from pure ammonium sulphate solutions accommodated the nitrogen sorption to the bone chars. The plant availability of the sorbed nitrogen was studied by a standardized short-term plant test with rye (

Indexed as

Animal residuesBiocharFertilizerNitrogenPyrolysisRecovery

Identifiers

PMID37095952
PMCPMC10121787
OpenAlexW4362510213

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.