Prevalence, Contamination Level, and Associated Factors of Methicillin-Resistant

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Staphylococcus aureus contamination in traditional buffalo milk supply chain in Bangladesh.Tropical animal health and production · 2026
   Article
2. Prevalence and risk factors of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in raw cow's milk and nasal and hand swabs of milkers in dairy farms in Mekelle city, Northern Ethiopia.BMC microbiology · 2026
   Article
3. Pathogenic bacteria in raw milk and milk products in Ethiopia: A decade review of prevalence, contributing factors, and antimicrobial resistance. A systematic review and meta-analysis.SAGE open medicine · 2025
   Review

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.