ArticleMateria socio-medica2023
Pregabalin in the Treatment of Peripheral and Central Chronic Neuropathic Pain.
Article in Materia socio-medica, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Improving Clinical Trial Design in Low Back Pain: Insights from Studies of Gabapentinoids.Pain and therapy · 2026Review
- PGC-1α Transcriptionally Regulated by ChREBP Mitigates Neuropathic Pain Through Promoting Microglial Fatty Acid Oxidation and Anti-Inflammatory Response.CNS neuroscience & therapeutics · 2026Article
- Patient-Reported Pain and Itch Scores After a Course of Laser Therapy for the Treatment of Postburn Hypertrophic Scar Are Impacted by Mental Health Status.Journal of burn care & research : official publication of the American Burn Association · 2025Article
- Characterization and Evaluation of the Cytotoxicity of Pregabalin Gels for Oral Application.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Managing multiple sclerosis in individuals aged 55 and above: a comprehensive review.Frontiers in immunology · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Pregabalin is a first-line therapy of pain with additional positive effects on the states of depression and anxiety that often occur in patients with chronic pain, thus improving their quality of life. Objective: The aim of this study was to demonstrate the efficacy of pregabalin in reducing neuropathic pain and improving quality of life in patients with peripheral and central chronic neuropathic pain in Bosnia and Herzegovina. Also, the aim was to monitor the safety of therapy with pregabalin. Methods: The study included patients with neuropathic pain lasting more than 3 months. Based on the underlying disease, patients were divided into 5 groups: DM-patients with diabetes mellitus, M-patients after stroke, D-patients with lower back pain, MS-patients with multiple sclerosis, and P group-patients with spinal cord injury. During the baseline visit, the Leeds Assessment of Neuropathic Symptoms and Signs (LANSS) was used to assess neuropathic pain. During two follow-up visits (1.5 and 3 months after baseline), the 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF 36) was used to assess the effectiveness of therapy on quality of life. The safety of the treatment was evaluated by monitoring the incidence of adverse drug reactions. Results: The study included 125 patients. During treatment with pregabalin, there was a statistically significant reduction in pain intensity in the DM, M, D and MS groups. In group P, the decrease in pain intensity was not statistically significant (p = 0.070). There was a significant improvement in different parameters of the quality of life in all analyzed groups, with the most prominent effects in the DM group. The effectiveness of treatment was rated as "good" and "very good" in more than 70% of subjects in each group. The expected side effects of treatment were recorded in 27.1% of patients in the DM group, in 20.0% in the M group and in 22.2% in the MS group. Unexpected side effects of treatment were observed in one patient (2.1%) in the DM group. Assessment of tolerability of the applied treatment showed "good" and "very good" response in 68.7% of patients in DM group, 73.3% in M group, 74.5% in D group, 88.9% in MS group and 85.8% in P group. Conclusion: Pregabalin is a safe and effective drug in treatment of neuropathic pain of different etiology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.