Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37095630›Full record

ArticleTropical medicine & international health : TM & IH2023

Lassa fever vaccine candidates: A scoping review of vaccine clinical trials.

Giorgia Sulis, Alexandra Peebles, Nicole E Basta

Open access · hybridAbstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Tropical medicine & international health : TM & IH, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
9.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 50 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Establishment of a Lassa Fever Specimen Biobank in Nigeria.The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene · 2025
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Giorgia SulisSchool of Epidemiology and Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-6641-0094
Alexandra PeeblesDepartment of Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Occupational Health, School of Population and Global Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, McGill University, Montreal, Canada.
Nicole E BastaDepartment of Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Occupational Health, School of Population and Global Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, McGill University, Montreal, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-4951-6353
McGill University Health Centre · CAUniversity of Ottawa · CA

Funding

Quantifying the Breadth and Duration of Immunity Induced by Meningococcal B VaccinesR01AI132496 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI BASTA, NICOLE ELAINE · 2018 to 2023
$3.1M
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI132496
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveLassa fever (LF) is caused by a viral pathogen with pandemic potential. LF vaccines have the potential to prevent significant disease in individuals at risk of infection, but no such vaccine has been licensed or authorised for use thus far. We conducted a scoping review to identify and compare registered phase 1, 2 or 3 clinical trials of LF vaccine candidates, and appraise the current trajectory of LF vaccine development.

methodWe systematically searched 24 trial registries, PubMed, relevant conference abstracts and additional grey literature sources up to 27 October 2022. After extracting key details about each vaccine candidate and each eligible trial, we qualitatively synthesised the evidence.

resultsWe found that four LF vaccine candidates (INO-4500, MV-LASV, rVSV∆G-LASV-GPC, and EBS-LASV) have entered the clinical stage of assessment. Five phase 1 trials (all focused on healthy adults) and one phase 2 trial (involving a broader age group from 18 months to 70 years) evaluating one of these vaccines have been registered to date. Here, we describe the characteristics of each vaccine candidate and trial and compare them to WHO's target product profile for Lassa vaccines.

conclusionThough LF vaccine development is still in early stages, current progress towards a safe and effective vaccine is encouraging.

Indexed as

Lassa FeverViral VaccinesHumansLassa virusViral Vaccinesclinical trialLASVpriority pathogensvaccine candidatevaccine developmentviral haemorrhagic fever

Identifiers

PMID37095630
PMCPMC10247453
OpenAlexW4366989717

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.