Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37095547›Full record

Observational studyBiology of sex differences2023

Prospective paired crossover evaluation of potential impact of investigator gender on perceived pain intensity early after acute or scheduled surgery.

Anna Sellgren Engskov, Andreas Ydrefors, Karolin El-Jaleb, Jonas Åkeson

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Biology of sex differences, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03968497 (Impact of Investigator Gender on Perceived Pain Intensity After Acute or Scheduled Surgery), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 42% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03968497 nacompletednot on this map

Impact of Investigator Gender on Perceived Pain Intensity After Acute or Scheduled Surgery

TypeinterventionalSponsorLund UniversityRan2018 to 2018Enrolled247ConditionsPostoperative PainArmsPostoperative pain assessment with female investigator, Postoperative pain assessment with male investigator
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Anna Sellgren EngskovDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden. anna.sellgren_engskov@med.lu.se.ORCID 0000-0003-2242-9134
Andreas YdreforsDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden.
Karolin El-JalebDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden.
Jonas ÅkesonDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden.
Lund University · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPostoperative pain is common but often difficult to assess, and there are many potential confounders. Over the last decades, the gender of investigator as well as participant has been found to influence pain perception in both preclinical and clinical studies. However, to our knowledge this has not been studied in various postoperative patients. Objectives of this study were to test the hypotheses that pain intensity levels early after acute or scheduled in- or out-hospital surgery are lower when evaluated by a female investigator, and higher when reported by a female patient.

methodsIn this prospective observational paired crossover study, two investigators of opposite genders independently obtained individually reported pain intensity levels with a visual analogue scale in a mixed cohort of adult postoperative study patients at Skåne University Hospital in Malmö, Sweden.

resultsIn total, 245 (129 female) study patients were included and then one female excluded. The study patients rated their intensity of postoperative pain lower when evaluated by a female than by a male investigator (P = 0.006), where the male patients constituted the significant difference (P < 0.001). Pain intensity levels did not differ between female and male study patients (P = 0.210).

conclusionsMain findings of lower pain intensity reported by males to a female than to a male investigator early after surgery in this paired crossover study in mixed postoperative patients, indicate that potential impact of investigator gender on pain perception should be considered and further evaluated in clinical bedside practice. Trial registration Retrospectively registered in the ClinicalTrials.gov research database on 24th June 2019 with TRN number NCT03968497.

Indexed as

Pain PerceptionPostoperative PainAdultCross-Over StudiesFemaleHumansMalePain MeasurementProspective StudiesAcute painGender identityMedical examinersPain measurementPostoperative carePostoperative painSexVisual Analog Scale

Identifiers

PMID37095547
PMCPMC10127324
OpenAlexW4366989679

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.