ArticleBMC biology2023
Prevalence, causes and impact of TP53-loss phenocopying events in human tumors.
Article in BMC biology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.
- CBC3T-3: a novel patient-derived cisplatin-resistant distal cholangiocarcinoma cell line harboring multiple TP53 missense mutations.Human cell · 2026Article
- Pathological role of deubiquitinating enzymes in lung cancer: recent insights and advances.American journal of cancer research · 2026Review
- Biological clocks keep a watch on mitosis.Nature cell biology · 2026Review
- Identification of high-risk signatures and therapeutic targets through molecular characterization and immune profiling of TP53-mutant breast cancer.Journal, genetic engineering & biotechnology · 2025Article
- Pan-cancer and machine learning reveal the role of cell adhesion molecules in prognosis, immune remodeling, and anti-tumour therapy in lower-grade gliomas.Discover oncology · 2025Article
- Variable efficiency of nonsense-mediated mRNA decay across human tissues, tumors and individuals.Genome biology · 2025Article
- Human Placental Genomic Instability Predicts Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes.Research square · 2025Article
- SMARCB1 orchestrates cellular plasticity and oncogenic pathways in typical and chondroid chordomas.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Iron metabolism in a mouse model of hepatocellular carcinoma.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Genistein as a Chemo-modulatory Agent: Exploring its Potential in Chemosensitization and Combinatorial Therapeutic Strategies for Cancer Treatment.Current topics in medicinal chemistry · 2025Review
- Copy number losses of oncogenes and gains of tumor suppressor genes generate common driver mutations.Nature communications · 2024Article
- Regulation of p53 by the mitotic surveillance/stopwatch pathway: implications in neurodevelopment and cancer.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2024Review
- FBXW7 in breast cancer: mechanism of action and therapeutic potential.Journal of experimental & clinical cancer research : CR · 2023Review
- A study related to the treatment of gastric cancer with Xiang-Sha-Liu-Jun-Zi-Tang based on network analysis.Heliyon · 2023Article
- Oncogene-like addiction to aneuploidy in human cancers.Science (New York, N.Y.) · 2023Article
- Oncogene-like addiction to aneuploidy in human cancers.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTP53 is a master tumor suppressor gene, mutated in approximately half of all human cancers. Given the many regulatory roles of the corresponding p53 protein, it is possible to infer loss of p53 activity - which may occur due to alterations in trans - from gene expression patterns. Several such alterations that phenocopy p53 loss are known, however additional ones may exist, but their identity and prevalence among human tumors are not well characterized.
resultsWe perform a large-scale statistical analysis on transcriptomes of ~ 7,000 tumors and ~ 1,000 cell lines, estimating that 12% and 8% of tumors and cancer cell lines, respectively, phenocopy TP53 loss: they are likely deficient in the activity of the p53 pathway, while not bearing obvious TP53 inactivating mutations. While some of these cases are explained by amplifications in the known phenocopying genes MDM2, MDM4 and PPM1D, many are not. An association analysis of cancer genomic scores jointly with CRISPR/RNAi genetic screening data identified an additional common TP53-loss phenocopying gene, USP28. Deletions in USP28 are associated with a TP53 functional impairment in 2.9-7.6% of breast, bladder, lung, liver and stomach tumors, and have comparable effect size to MDM4 amplifications. Additionally, in the known copy number alteration (CNA) segment harboring MDM2, we identify an additional co-amplified gene (CNOT2) that may cooperatively boost the TP53 functional inactivation effect of MDM2. An analysis of cancer cell line drug screens using phenocopy scores suggests that TP53 (in)activity commonly modulates associations between anticancer drug effects and various genetic markers, such as PIK3CA and PTEN mutations, and should thus be considered as a drug activity modifying factor in precision medicine. As a resource, we provide the drug-genetic marker associations that differ depending on TP53 functional status.
conclusionsHuman tumors that do not bear obvious TP53 genetic alterations but that phenocopy p53 activity loss are common, and the USP28 gene deletions are one likely cause.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.