Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37095399›Full record

ArticleNature neuroscience2023

Functional brain networks reflect spatial and temporal autocorrelation.

Maxwell Shinn, Amber Hu, Laurel Turner, Stephanie Noble, Katrin H Preller, Jie Lisa Ji, Flora Moujaes, Sophie Achard, Dustin Scheinost, R Todd Constable and 6 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Nature neuroscience, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 70 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
70citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
15.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

70 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 90 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Glutamatergic Modulation of Brain Function in Psychosis: A Systematic Review of Neuroimaging Studies.Biological psychiatry. Cognitive neuroscience and neuroimaging · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. The application value of Rs-fMRI-based machine learning models for differentiating mild cognitive impairment from Alzheimer's disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2025
    Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Memristive singular value decomposition.Nature communications · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

10 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Maxwell ShinnInterdepartmental Neuroscience Program, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7424-4230
Amber HuYale College, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA.
Laurel TurnerYale College, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA.
Stephanie NobleDepartment of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4804-5553
Katrin H PrellerDepartment of Psychiatry, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0413-7672
Jie Lisa JiDepartment of Psychiatry, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6280-9070
Flora MoujaesDepartment of Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, University Hospital for Psychiatry, Zurich, Switzerland.
Sophie AchardUniversity of Grenoble Alpes, CNRS, Inria, Grenoble INP, LJK, Grenoble, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9448-1199
Dustin ScheinostInterdepartmental Neuroscience Program, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6301-1167
R Todd ConstableInterdepartmental Neuroscience Program, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5661-9521
John H KrystalDepartment of Psychiatry, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6952-1726
Franz X VollenweiderDepartment of Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, University Hospital for Psychiatry, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9053-6164
Daeyeol LeeZanvyl Krieger Mind/Brain Institute, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Alan AnticevicInterdepartmental Neuroscience Program, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA.
Edward T Bullmore *Department of Psychiatry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
John D Murray *Interdepartmental Neuroscience Program, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA. john.murray@yale.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4115-8181
Yale University · USAllen Institute for Brain Science · USInstitut polytechnique de Grenoble · FRUniversity of Cambridge · GB

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/H008217/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

High-throughput experimental methods in neuroscience have led to an explosion of techniques for measuring complex interactions and multi-dimensional patterns. However, whether sophisticated measures of emergent phenomena can be traced back to simpler, low-dimensional statistics is largely unknown. To explore this question, we examined resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging (rs-fMRI) data using complex topology measures from network neuroscience. Here we show that spatial and temporal autocorrelation are reliable statistics that explain numerous measures of network topology. Surrogate time series with subject-matched spatial and temporal autocorrelation capture nearly all reliable individual and regional variation in these topology measures. Network topology changes during aging are driven by spatial autocorrelation, and multiple serotonergic drugs causally induce the same topographic change in temporal autocorrelation. This reductionistic interpretation of widely used complexity measures may help link them to neurobiology.

Indexed as

Brain MappingMagnetic Resonance ImagingBrainTime Factors

Identifiers

PMID37095399
OpenAlexW4366824339

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.